Property Division
Spousal/Child Support
Custody
Premarital Agreements
Custody Modification
100

Community approach

What's mine is yours and what's yours is mine, equal division 

100

Child Support Models

Percentage of Income Model (used in ND)

- looks at percentage on non-custodial parent of their income to determine what they pay

Income Shares Model

- looks at both parent's income to determine obligation. Support from each parent is based on the obligation 

100

Parenting Plan 

A written plan describing each parent's rights and responsibilities 

100

Legal Requirement 

Offer and acceptance, supported by consideration, parties have capacity to sign, and subject matter of the agreement cannot be illegal 

100

What factors are used when relocation out of state

Stout Hawkinson and Best Interest Factors

200

Common Law approach

What's yours is yours, what's mine is mine. Commingling- when property is purchased during marriage, becomes marital property and may be split

200

Types of Spousal Support 

1) Permanent 

2) Rehabilitative

3) Limited

200

Legal Custody

Decision-making responsibilities and parental rights and responsibilities 

200

ND exception to waiver of spousal support

"if a prenup modifies or eliminates spousal support.. causes the party to be eligible for support under a program of public assistance at time of separation.. may require the other party to provide support to the extent necessary to avoid that eligibility"

200

Mileage restriction 

prevents parent from moving across the state to another city (and away from where non-residential parent lives)

300

Partnership Rationale

Gives homemaker spouse right to property, refuses to divide separate property or take it into account in dividing partnership assets
300

Permanent Spousal Support 

Traditional type

Provides support for the financially weaker spouse, for indefinite time frame

300

Residential Responsibility 

Parent's responsibility to provide home for child

Primary - 51% or more of overnights

Equal - 50/50 overnights 

300

UPAA unenforceability approach 

2 elements:

The agreement was unconscionable

There was a lack of adequate disclosure 

(look at dates and lack of detail on financial disclosure)

300

Slappy

3 prong burdern

1) material change

2) decline in child's condition

3) best interest of child 

400

General Rule (split of property re: marriage length)

The longer the marriage, looks to a 50/50 split when dividing property. The shorter the marriage, looks to what is equitable when dividing property 

400

Rehabilitative Spousal Support 

One party helps other party get back on their feet. Previous economic dependent spouse can develop their earning potential. Appropriate when it is possible to restore an economically disadvantage spouse to independent economic status or to equalize the burden of finances.

400

Best Interest Factor J - DV

Instance resulting in serious bodily harm (hospitalization)

Instance with dangerous weapon (only one occurrence)

Pattern of DV reasonably proximate in time to proceedings 

400

Prenup may be unenforceable if:

Involuntary (duress)

Party didn't have access to independent legal representation (reasonable time to locate, retain, obtain advice and consider advice)

The agreement didn't include notice of waiver of rights or an explanation in plain language (unless the party had independent legal counsel)

No adequate financial disclosure 

400

Exceptions to 2 years modification rule

May motion for the court to modify prior to 2 years if necessary to serve best interest of child and there is parent alienation, harm to the child, or residential responsibility has changed to other parent for more than 6 months

500

Ruff Fischer Factors

1) Age of Parties

2) Earning ability 

3) Duration of marriage

4) Conduct in marriage

5) Station in life

6) Necessity and Circumstances of each

7) Health and Physical Condition of each

8) Financial Circumstances 

500

Termination of Permanent Support Factors

Remarriage

Habitual Cohabitation in a relationship analogous to a marriage for one year or more 

(also death and change in financial circumstances)

500

ND Best Interest Factors

Love and Affection

Basic needs of the child

Child Development

Stability of the home, how much time is spent in the home

Encourage relationship between parents and child

Moral Fitness of parents and impacts on child

Mental and Physical Fitness of parents and impacts on child

Home, School, and Community records and potential effects of change 

Child wishes, must show maturity

Domestic Violence

Interrelationship with people coming into the home, new partners of parents

Bad faith false allegations made of a parent to the child

Catchall 

500

Procedural Fairness Factors

Full disclosure of net worth

The availability of independent counsel or knowing and voluntary waiver of such representation

The timing of the presentation of the agreement, giving sufficient time to review before the wedding, and

The relative bargaining power of the parties, and their relative levels of financial or legal knowledge 

500

Stout Hawkinson Factors 

1) Advantages to move

2) Integrity of motive of moving parent

3) Integrity of motive of non-custodial parent for opposing move

4) Potential negative impacts on relationship between non-custodial parent and child. Possible visitation arrangements

M
e
n
u