We're on the Field
Ready to Search?
Strategies, strategies, strategies
How about Gap?
Your reliability is validity
100

is a qualitative method where a data is collected by observing and interpreting subjects in their natural environment.

Field Research

100

the initial declaration of your study's central intent.

Purposive Statements

100

measures 2 variables and assessing their statistical relationships without controlling extraneous factors.

Correlational Research

100

represent uncharted territories or unresolved questions within existing literature. They are the spaces where current knowledge is insufficient, contradictory, or lacks specific focus.

Research Gap

100

refers to a consistency of a measure.

Reliability

200

Pros of Conducting Field research

- Rich in contextual data

- Deep understanding

- Emergent insights

- Non-intrusive observation

- Real world Validity

- Thorough and precise

200

understanding the lenses through which your research is viewed.

Theoretical Framework

200

statistically describes a population, situation, or phenomenon. It answers "what," "where," "when," and "how" questions, but not "why."

Descriptive Research

200

occurs when there is little to no research on a specific topic, populations, or setting. It signifies a complete absence of empirical data in a particular area.

Evidence Gap

200

is the extent to which a measure accurately represents the variable it's intended to measure.

Validity

300

Cons of Conducting Field Research

- Risk on information loss

- Research discrepancy

- Unobservable phenomena

- Reliability challenges

- Time and resource intensive

- Loss of objectivity

- Subjective and interpretive

300

statistically selecting who to study.

Sampling and Populations

300

systematically Manipulates one or more variables to evaluate their impact to an outcome, while holding all other variables constant. This allows researchers to isolate the effects of the manipulated variable, establishing casual relationships.

Experimental Research

300

arises when some research exits, but critical questions remain unanswered. It points to areas where existing studies have not fully explored provided definitive conclusions.

Knowledge Gap

300

consistency of judgements or observations across different researchers or observes.

Interrater Reliability

400

-conducted in a natural settings

- observes, analyzes, and describes what exists

- participants may or may not be aware of being studied (covert observation)

- descriptive, developmental, correlational, and survey-related research

- results are detailed and vast, providing rich content

Field Research

400

specific predictions or questions that narrow your purpose statement.

Research Questions and Hypotheses

400

each participants is tested in only one conditions.

Between-Subject Design

400

when theories are well-established, but practical solutions or real-worlds applications are lacking.

Practical/Application Gap

400

are scores on the measures correlated with other relevant variables.

Criterion Validity

500

- resembles the natural settings but is controlled

- controlled investigation

- participants are informed based on ethical norms (informed consent)

- based on the conclusion of the hypotheses

- results are specific and rely on the experiment performed

Laboratory Research

500

precisely defining what you will measure.

Variables and Operational Defenitions

500

each participant is tested under all conditions.

Within-Subjects Design

500

emerges when existing studies report inconsistent or conflicting results, making it difficult to draw clear conclusions.

Contradictory Findings Gap

500

does the measure cover all aspects of construct's conceptual's definition?

Content Validity

M
e
n
u