300
Debt is subsidized. So why don't shareholders favor companies who exclusively hold debt?
there are numerous reasons why companies borrow – tax yield benefits valuable (low leverage in oil, high leverage in tech tech can use debt, oil companies have subsidy and many other benefits – for oil companies to use debt as an alternative doesn’t make sense.
If there is no benefit to debt, don’t take it. The more debt you take on, the higher is the cost of the debt.
Higher interest rates interest rates will rise if there is higher debt and therefore a higher perceived risk of the company
There are some benefits to companies taking on debt.
Unless and until you receive all interest payments, you cannot issue dividend.
You no longer run the company the way you feel the company should be run, but the way the banks require that you run it in order to get paid (types and longevity of investments constraints) in order to safeguard creditors