Warrants
Exigency & Knock and Announce
Consent
Incident to arrest
Special Locations
100

probable cause, particularity, and a neutral magistrate are requirements for what?

A warrant 

100

Urgent situation leads to a warrant exception

Exigency

100

Requirements for consent searches

Must be voluntary

can not be a product of coercion 

100

Police may conduct a full search of the person and area with in immediate control with out additional justification when

incident to arrest 

100

When non-routine these searches require a higher level of justification 

one case stated the standard was RS

non-routine border searches 

200

The magistrate must determine 

That its probable that contraband, evidence of a crime or a fugitive will be on described premises when the (Blank) is executed 

for what?

An Anticipatory warrant 

200

Knock and Announce requirements

1) knock and announce

2) wait reasonable amount of time 

200

Third parties may consent in these circumstance (2)

areas of common authority or

with apparent authority

200

There is no search incident to what 

citation

200

What type of searches require specific suspicion of contraband on the person?

Strip searches

300

A magistrate must be (blank) and (blank) for the neutrality requirement of warrants 

What are the Blanks? 

Neutral and Detached 

300

US. v. Banks

Knock and announce violations don't trigger suppression

300
a clerk cant consent for a guest 

A landlord cant consent for a tenant 

These are examples of what

Limits on third party consent 

300

Riley v. California 

a warrant is needed to search a phone even if it was on the person at the time of the arrest

300

Cases in the class stated that these papers could be searched 

What types of papers are they (2)

Medical records and Bank records 

400

A warrant must describe the place to be searched and the persons or things to be seized 

Which requirement is this?

Particularity 

400

totality of the circumstances + gravity of the offense is the analysis for what

Exigency 

400

Bumper v. North Carolina

a false claim of warrant authority negates consent

400

Maryland v. Buie

a limited sweep of the home may be performed incident to arrest

400

1) its a non-investigatory work-related search OR

2) an investigation of work-related misconduct

When the employer is government this test can provide an exemption to what?

Warrants

500

Marron v. US

warrant does not need to be an item by item list just tied to the specific offense 
500

Lange v. California

supplies the necessity of the gravity of the offense 

500

If the arrestee is unsecured and within reaching distance at the time of search or it is reasonable to believe evidence of related to the crime is inside officers may search what incident to arrest 

Vehicles 

500

What is the full name of this test?

1) reasonableness at inception

2) reasonably related in scope

T.L.O two prong test

M
e
n
u