Seeds of Change
Power in Practice
Macro Practice
Agents of Impact
Advocacy in Action
100

This vital component of social work empowers professionals to influence laws and promote social justice.

legislative advocacy

100

This psychologist first introduced the theory of self-efficacy.

Albert Bandura

100

Macro social work focuses on helping these, not just individuals.

communities, organizations, or systems.

100

This kind of learning helped students see themselves as capable of influencing systems, not just serving clients.

experiential learning

100

Students described LEAD using these three empowering words.

“eye-opening,” “empowering,” and “essential”

200

The study aimed to explore how this educational experience impacts students’ confidence in advocacy.

participation in NASW’s Legislative Education and Advocacy Day (LEAD)

200

Students’ belief that “I can effectively influence policy” reflects growth in this area.

advocacy self-efficacy

200

Working with lawmakers, agencies, and communities is an example of this level of social work.

macro-level practice

200

The study found that when students feel capable of influencing policy, they’re more likely to do this after graduation.

continue engaging in advocacy or political action

200

By sitting in on these meetings, students learned about the human impact of political decision-making.

committee meetings

300

This concept measures how capable someone feels to achieve a goal or perform a task.

self-efficacy

300

When students observe debates and meet legislators, they transform classroom lessons into this.

real-world experience or applied learning

300

This approach focuses on changing laws and policies that affect large groups.

policy advocacy

300

Advocating side-by-side with peers created this empowering sense of unity and shared purpose.

solidarity

300

Meeting with lawmakers gave students the chance to practice this core macro-level skill often taught in advocacy courses.

lobbying or policy communication

400

Students from these two academic programs took part in the study.

BSW and MSW programs

400

Confidence built through practice is the bridge between passion and this kind of professional impact.

policy impact

400

Social workers use this process to identify community needs before creating programs.

needs assessment

400

Students recommended making LEAD this kind of requirement for social work education.

mandatory or required experience

400

Watching debates unfold and policies take shape gave students a front-row seat to how social work values are translated into this kind of real-world influence.

policy impact

500

The research combined both numbers and narratives using this kind of design.

mixed-methods pre/post survey design

500

According to the study, self-efficacy scores rose from 14.0 to this number after LEAD participation.

15.7 out of 20

500

When social workers push for equality and fairness, they are promoting this value.

social justice

500

Students’ self-efficacy increased from 14.0 to 15.7 out of 20 after attending this event.

NASW LEAD

500

This helped students see the human impact of policy decisions and the power dynamics of governance.

committee meetings

M
e
n
u