No Child Left Behind
National Reading Panel
Response to Intervention
Title 1
100
How is student achievement measured?
Multiple choice tests
100
What did the participants of the NRP stress as important?
Phonemic awareness and a combination of reading strategies
100
What can a child who is struggling receive through RTI?
Intensive and targeted intervention
100
Title 1 was designed to improve education for whom?
Minorities and low-income students
200
What subjects are the major focus for No Child Left Behind?
Math and Reading
200
According to the NRP, what do children and teachers come into the classroom with?
Different levels of preparation
200
Data is collected on a routine basis for whom?
All students
200
What is available for schools that demonstrate "compliance"?
Financial assistance (grants)
300
Students are held to the same achievement standard regardless of what?
Ability level, socioeconomic status or cultural background.
300
When the NRP was implementing their research, there were too few studies of this type of readers?
Low-achieving readers
300
Who are most likely not to be identified?
Students who are at grade level
300
How many students in Elementary Schools does Title 1 reach?
Six million
400
What is the student proficiency goal for the year of 2014?
100 percent for all students
400
Who made up the majority of the panel?
Doctors and professors
400
Why are teachers not likely to implement the research based instruction of RTI?
They are not being adequately trained
400
Title 1 teachers have to assess students using what?
Multiple measures
500
Based on the No Child Left Behind Act what is the cost of supplemental services for students?
It is free
500
Information on reading was gathered in what way?
Reviewing databases, communicating with the public and consulting with organizations.
500
What is something teachers may not have to implement the research based instruction?
Time
500
How many years of Title 1 services are disadvantaged students likely to receive?
One or two years
M
e
n
u