A) Yes
B) No
A) Caucasian, Middle-class background
B) Students with parents with high-level educational experience
C) Students from low-income and minority families
C) Students from low-income and minority families
Tracking significantly benefits high-achieving students
A) Teacher opinions
B) Financial Statistics
C) Student Achievement
C) Student Achievement
A) almost always ineffective
B) Often biased
C) A waste of money
D) All of the above
D) All of the above
A) Class and Race
B) Gender and Race
C) Age and Gender
A) Class and Race
A) Tennesse
B) Wisconsin
C) Ohio
A) They all show that retained students benefit from being held back
B) All studies show that retained students are doing worse than before
C) Studies consistently show that students do not do as well as they could if they were promoted
C) Studies consistently show that students do not do as well as they could if they were promoted
A) Finland and Denmark
B)Korea and England
C) Finland and Korea
C) Finland and Korea
A) Lowers the student's academic abilities
B) Allows for interaction between students with different backgrounds and abilities
C) Discourages friendships
B) Allows for interaction between students with different backgrounds and abilities
Low tracks can tell the students they lack academic potential, causing the students to perceive themselves as bad students, lowering their motivation