Fallacies of Ambiguity
Fallacies of Relevance
Fallacies of Relevance (cont.)
Fallacies of Unwarranted Assumptions
Fallacies of Unwarranted Assumptions (cont.)
100

An ambiguous word or phrase changes the meaning over the course of an argument.

Equivocation

100

A threat to use force - whether it be physical, psychological, or legal - in an attempt to get another person to back down on his or her position and accept the conclusion as correct. 

Appeal to Force

100

A conclusion based on atypical cases.

Hasty Generalization

100

An appeal based on the testimony of an authority in a field other than that under investigation. 

Inappropriate Appeal to Authority

100

The assumption that because something is natural it is good or acceptable.

Naturalistic Fallacy
200

An argument contains a grammatical mistake that allows more than one conclusion to be drawn.

Amphiboly

200

An attempt to gain support for a conclusion by evoking a feeling of pity, when pity is irrelevant to the conclusion.

Appeal to Pity

200

The distortion of misrepresentation of an opponent's argument to make it easier to knock down or refute. 

Straw Man

200

A question that assumes a particular answer to another unasked question. 

Loaded Question

200

An argument that assumes without sufficient evidence that one thing is the cause of another. 

Questionable Cause

300

The meaning of an argument changes depending on which word or phrase is emphasized. 

Fallacy of Accent

300

An appeal made to the opinion of the majority to gain support for the conclusion. 

Popular Appeal

300

An argument directed toward a conclusion that is different from that posed by the original argument.

Red Herring

300

An argument unwarrantedly reduces the number of alternatives to two.  

False Dilemma

400

An erroneous inference from the characteristics of an entire set or group about a member of that group or set. 

Fallacy of Division

400

An argument that something is true simply because no one has proved it false, or that something is false because no one has proved it true. 

Appeal to Ignorance

400

An assumption that if some actions are permitted, all actions of that type will soon be permissible. 

Slippery Slope

500

A characteristic of a member of a group is erroneously assumed to be characteristic of the whole group. 

Fallacy of Composition

500
An attempt to refute an argument by attacking the character or circumstances of the person making the argument.

Ad Hominem Fallacy

500

A conclusion is simply a rewording of a premise.

Begging the Question

M
e
n
u