Hearsay
Pros. Make Obj.
Pros Doos is getting Cx'ed and the Attorney says "that's when you suggested that you commit the sabotage yourself"
801 to the statements of Doos
Pros. Make Obj
A Def. witness says "that when Kaye told us that if we keep certain contestants on the show we get $50,000"
801
except: 803(3) or being used for notice
Def. Make Obj.
Jha is testifying to the contents of exhibit 12 saying "it includes a list of the archetypes for the witnesses" before entering it into evidence
1002 - best evidence
Def. Make Obj.
Dr Hartley is testifying that they used ex. 14, and prosecution is moving to enter it into evidence
801 - good faith basis they didn't rely on it and the info to go to their conclusions
Except: Mississippi BBQ, or 705
Pros. Fight Obj
Defense just objected under 702(d) to Dr. Hartley's conclusion because they did not explain enough of how they connected their method to the facts and data of the case
Davis v. Adams
This goes to weight not admissibility
Def. Make Obj.
pseudo expert Taren Rivera is trying to enter Kaye's interrogation, Ex 6, into evidence
801
Mississippi
Pros. Make Obj.
Def. Indigo Quade says: "Ms. Martin then said 'This time I am going to murder you'"
Obj. Hearsay
Except: 803(3)
Def. Make Obj
Taylor Jha states "It's clear that Charlie Martin hated Rob Armstrong"
*Taylor Jha has testified briefly about the relationship between the two. They are also the first witness in the case in chief
Speculation
Pros. Make Obj.
Dr. Marlowe is concluding that "there is no way Oxalic Acid could have been the cause of Rob Armstrong's death"
702 (b)
Pros. Make Obj
Charlie Martin is testifying that Riley Kaye Gave him the bottle and told him not to worry about it and to put it in Rob Armstrong's mask
State v. Bernardi (2018)
another's negligence does not discount the actions of the defendant themselves
Pros. Make Obj.
Dr. Hartley is not being called
Opp. counsel is trying to enter dive footage notes Ex.5
801- they are being used for the truth of the matter Stip. 9- Ex. 5 is truthful and accurate so the truth of the matter is not up for contention
Pros Make Obj.
Def is trying to enter Ex. 18 on Rivera Cx. but Rivera has not laid out how they are familiar with the exhibit
hearsay
good faith basis that they did not have access to the messages during filming
plans and excited utterance?
Def. Make Obj
Taren Rivera just testified that the defendant was in a restricted area that was off limits to contestants
602 - Need for personal knowledge
Pros. Make Obj.
Dr. Lin just stated "Charlie Martin was no way in control of their actions. They were for sure being manipulated.
404 - opinion on the ultimate issue
or
State v. Bunker
Def. Fight Obj.
you were questioning Patel about the safety protocols and Pros. objects under State v. Teglia
State v. Teglia
Pros Make Obj
Def is trying to enter ex. 5 on Dr. Marlowe
801
stip. 9
Def Make Obj.
Pros is trying to enter ex 19 on a lay witness (it is not stipulated to be waived)
hearsay to all
Ginger v. Heisman
Def. Make Obj.
Taren Rivera is utilizing a demo titled "The Events of The Saboteurs", but only makes three points that target Charlie Martin
403 - More Prejudicial than Probative
Pros. Make Obj
Defense tries to enter exhibit 26 on Dr. Lin's direct
801 - hearsay
Def. Fight Obj.
during your Marlowe Dx, Pros. objects under Kane Software to the Dr. not including his method in his report.
Yo-uh, or 705
Def. Make Obj.
pros is trying to enter ex. 7
801(d)(2)(a) - party opponent
Questions have no inherent truth value
Effect on the listener
Def. Make Obj.
Pros. tries to enter Riley Kaye's interrogation on lay witness
801 - the entire doc
Def. Make Obj
Jha states "the rules of the game are that if the game has to end early then the remaining players would split the prize money"
1002 - Best Evidence
there is an original document that contains this information that is available for the court today and needs to be entered in order for this witness to testify to the contents of that document.
Def Make Obj.
Pros calls Dr. Hartley and is moving ex. 3 & 4 into evidence on Hartley Dx
702 to the contents of the reports not following a method
Pros. Fight Obj.
Pros just obj. under 801, and Def is trying to proffer with inadmissible hearsay in order to show the exception to the statement just elicited from lay witness.
Zomerfeld v. Noto (2012)