Rules
Distribution
Validity
Fallacies
Am I Valid?
100


This is the least number of times a middle term should be distributed in a valid syllogism.


What is...one?

100

There are no distributed terms in this type of statement. 

What is an... I statement?

100

When creating a counterexample syllogism, we create this type of conclusion. 

What is...False?

100

Which fallacy breaks rule #4? 

What is...the Fallacy of a Negative Premise and an Affirmative Conclusion?

100

All S is M

No M is P

Therefore, Some S is not P

What is...Valid?

200

In rule two, we look to this part of a syllogism to determine if the Major and Minor terms need to be distributed in their premises.

What is...the conclusion?

200

Both terms are distributed in this statement.

What is an...E statement?

200

If the premises are true and the conclusion is false, the syllogism is considered to be this.

What is...Invalid?

200

This Fallacy has terms which are distributed in the conclusion but are not distributed in the premises.

What is...the Fallacy of the Illicit Major and Illicit Minor?

200

Some P is M

All S is M

Therefore, Some S is P

What is...Invalid? (Fallacy: Undistributed Middle)

300

According to rule three, there should not be
______ ____________ ______________ in a valid syllogism. 

What is...two negative premises?

300

This term is distributed in an A statement.

What is...The subject? 

300

If a syllogism is valid AND the premises are true, it is said to be this.

What is...Sound?

300

This fallacy breaks rule #5.

What is...The Fallacy of Two Affirmative Premises and a Negative conclusion?

300

No P are M

All M are S

Therefore, no S are P 

What is...Invalid? (Fallacy: Illicit Minor)

400

Rule 4 states: A valid syllogism cannot have a ___________ ___________ and an _______________ ____________. 

What is...a negative premise and an affirmative conclusion?

400

This term is distributed in an O statement.

What is...The predicate?

400

These are the two ways to test the validity of a syllogism.

What are...Counterexample and Rules?

400

This fallacy happens when a syllogism contains two I statements.

What is...the Fallacy of the Undistributed Middle?

400

All M is P

All S is M

Therefore, Some S is not P

What is...Invalid? 

(Fallacies: 2 Affirmative premises with negative conclusion & Illicit Minor)

500

Rule five states: A valid syllogism cannot have 

______ _______________ _____________ 

and a negative conclusion. 

What is...two affirmative premises?

500

A distributed term refers to ________ members of its category. 

What is...All?

500

This is a syllogism of the same form as the original, but with obviously true premises and an obviously false conclusion, in order to show the original to be invalid.

What is...a counterexample?

500

This Fallacy shown here:

No fish are mammals.

No fish are snakes.

Therefore no snakes are mammals.

What is...the Fallacy of Two Negative Premises?

500

Some M is P

Some S is M

Therefore, No S is P

What is...Invalid? 

(Fallacies: 2 Affirmative premises with negative conclusion, Illicit Major, Illicit Minor, Undistributed Middle)

M
e
n
u