Arguments
Mill's Methods 1
Mill's Methods 2
Inductive Fallacies
Biases and Generalizations
100

This is the definition of "argument" that we have been using in class all semester. 

Some number of premises put forward in favor of a conclusion. 

100

Mill's Methods are intended to demonstrate a relationship between ______ and ______. 

Cause and effect

100

Name the method:

TUVX --> Y

TUV- --> ~Y

The method of difference

100

The fallacy based on the idea that since A happened before B, A must have caused B

Post hoc
100

A representative sample of a population needs to have two characteristics (name at least one). 

Large and randomized

200

This kind of argument is intended to show that its conclusion is guaranteed. 

A deductive argument

200

This method is based on finding a commonality in a wide range of varied situations that lead to a common effect.

The method of agreement. 

200

Name the method: 

PQX --> Y

XRE --> Y

ABX --> Y 

The method of agreement

200

The fallacy based on the idea that if something is true of some members of a population, it must be true of all or most members of the population. 

Hasty generalization

200

This bias is a tendency to easily find evidence in favor on one's views and a difficulty finding evidence against one's views. 

Confirmation bias

300

This kind of argument is intended to show that its conclusion is probably true. 

An inductive argument

300

This method is based on comparing the case where a cause is absent and the case where a cause is present to determine if that has some influence on the outcome.

The method of difference

300

Name the method:

A + B caused X

A caused part of X

So, B caused the rest of X

The method of residues

300

This fallacy is based on the idea that if someone is an expert, then they must be right or are probably right. 

Appeal to authority 

300

This bias is the tendency for events to appear more common if they are easy to remember, or if it is easy to think of examples. 

The availability heuristic 

400

When an inductive argument has premises that support its conclusion, but the premises may or may not be true, it is this kind of argument. 

A strong argument

400

This method is based on the idea that differences in the quantity of a cause influences the quantity of the effect.

The method of concomitant variation

400

Name the method:

J K More X --> More Y

J K Moderate X --> Moderate Y

J K Less X --> Less Y 

The method of concomitant variation.

400

This fallacy is based on the idea that if a claim cannot be proven false, then it is probably true. 

Appeal to ignorance

400

This bias is based on a tendency for events to seem more likely after they have already happened. 

Hindsight bias

500

When a strong inductive argument has all true premises, it is this kind of argument. 

A cogent argument

500

This method is based on an inference about partial causal contributions.

The method of residues. 

500

The full name of the philosopher who created Mill's Methods 

John Stuart Mill

500

This fallacy (that we did not discuss much in class) is based on the idea that if something is true of most members of a population, it must be true of each member of a population. 

Accident

500

According to this theorem, a randomized sample tends to become more representative the larger it becomes.

The Central Limit Theorem

M
e
n
u