This kind of proposition serves as evidence/justification/reasons in an argument.
Premises
This is the definition for "fallacies" that we use in this course.
Biases are psychological tendencies. But we are interested in biases in this class because they lead to the following outcome.
Bad arguments
These kinds of premises work together to support a conclusion. They can be compared to two or people opening a lock by turning their keys at the same time.
Dependent premises
This kind of argument is intended to guarantee a true conclusion.
A deductive argument.
This kind of proposition serves as the main point in an argument.
Conclusion
Appeal to majority
Hindsight bias
These kinds of premises offer individual support to a conclusion. They can be compared to a group of people picking up a table.
Independent premises
This kind of argument is intended to show that its conclusion is probable.
An inductive argument.
These are special terms or phrases that link propositions to other propositions.
Connectives
This fallacy is based on misrepresenting someone's claim or argument to make it easier to attack.
This bias concerns the phenomenon of events seeming more common when examples easily or quickly come to mind.
Availability heuristic
This kind of proposition is a premise and a conclusion at the same time.
A subconclusion.
A sound argument.
These kinds of sentences do not express propositions (name one).
Questions, commands, or exclamations
This fallacy is based on the error of confusing an object with the parts of the object.
Composition (or division)
This bias describes the phenomenon of estimating or expecting quantities based on reference points.
Anchoring heuristic
Dependent premises are signified on diagrams by using this symbol.
The plus sign (+)
If some of cogent argument's premises change from true to false, it becomes this kind of argument.
A strong argument.
This kind of sentence is typically used to express a proposition.
Declarative sentencee
Subjectivism and ad hominem both fall under this general category.
Fallacy of relevance
Cognitive dissonance and the attribution bias both fall under this general category.
Self-defensive biases
This kind of proposition is neither an independent premise, a dependent premise, nor is it a subconclusion in an argument diagram.