Proof 11
What is a קרי וכתיב?
When something is written in a pasuk one way and read in the pasuk a different way
What does yud of יעל קגם stand for?
יאוש שלא מדעת
What is the rule for כריכות ברשות הרבים?
שלו
The halacha generally follows me when I argue with אביי
What is הכשר טומאה?
When something is prepared to become tamei.
What is the rule for when something is washed in the river and it has a sign?
The finder can keep it
What is a סימן העשוי לידרס?
A סימן that will likely get trampled and the owner is not confident it will remain
The halacha follows me for יעל קגם
אביי
What are the three criteria for something to become מוכשר לטומאה?
1. not connected to the ground
2. got wet
3. the owner wanted it wet
What is a היקש?
A juxtaposition - when two topics are next to each other in the pesukim, we learn out halachot from one topic apply to the other topic.
Which two Rabbis have a מחלוקת about סימן העשוי לידרס?
רבה and רבא
A phrase from kaddish helps remind how to pronounce my name
רבה
What does יד שחט דם stand for?
יין
דם
שמן
חלב
טל
דבש
מים
Explain the דיוק of the Gemara for אשר תאבד ממנו
Only if something was lost from the owner and is findable by everyone else does the finder have an obligation to return it, but if it is not findable by everyone else, then the finder can keep it.
Consider כריכות ברשות הרבים הרי אלו שלו ברשות היחיד נוטל ומכריז. Explain how to explain the mishna according to רבה.
It must be where there is a סימן because otherwise it is impossible to announce when found in רשות היחיד. Therefore, it must have a sign even in רשות הרבים and he can keep it because a סימן העשוי לידרס is not a valid סימן.
I taught the meaning of the קרי וכתיב of כי יתן/כי יותן
רב פפא
Who does this proof attempt to prove in the הוה אמינא and how?
Tries to prove Abaye. The seifa of the Mishna says that when someone was happy with the food getting wet only after they had dried, it is not מוכשר לטומאה. This indicates that we don't say the owner's knowledge works retroactively for הכשר טומאה. And if it doesn't work for הכשר טומאה, then it also shouldn't work for יאוש שלא מדעת, which is Abaye's opinion.
For the case of תמרי דזיקא, explain what they are and what is the rule for if there is a fence or if the property is owned by orphans that are minors.
It is a case where dates blew of the tree onto the ground.
For both, the rule is you can't keep them. With the fence, you can't keep them because the creepy-crawlies won't be able to access them so the owner doesn't have יאוש. In a case of owned by orphans, you can't keep it because minors cannot make their property הפקר.
Consider כריכות ברשות הרבים הרי אלו שלו ברשות היחיד נוטל ומכריז. Say how to explain the mishna according to רבא.
The mishna is talking about where there is no sign because otherwise even in רשות הרבים you would still have to announce since a סימן העשוי לידרס is a valid sign. You have to announce in רשות היחיד even without a סימן because the place it is found is considered a סימן.
I asked what the rule is for the case of תמרי דזיקא
רב אחא