Part 1: Context
Part 2: Current Practices
Part 3: Policy Recommendations
Part 4: Criticisms
Wild Cards
100

Normative practices and policies that lead to delay 

Culture of Complacency

100

Reasonably unforeseen or unavoidable / cannot reasonably be remedied 

Exceptional Circumstances 

100

Where are changes being implemented elsewhere?

The UK

100

The minimum remedy for 11b rights infringement

Stay of proceedings

100

The level of court this case comes from 

Supreme Court of Canada

200

Name at least one of the two cases preceding R v Jordan

Askov / Morin

200

Name one way the Crown can justify a delay 

Societal interests, greater risk of harm, exceptional/strenuous circumstances, and temporary court congestion

200

"Maximizing first appearances" belongs to which policy recommendation category?

A) Case Management

B) Judicial Resources

C) Bail Reform / Police Powers

D) Federal Legislation Revision

E) Availability of Programs

A) Case Management

200

The only person who can grant a stay of proceedings

Trial or superior judge

200

The section of the Charter that relates to this case

11b

300

Ontario's overall report card grade regarding the criminal justice system

C+

300

Name one of the other practices that courts are using to manage trial delay

Technology & E-Filing / Specialized Courts / Access to Justice

300

"Restorative Justice" belongs to which policy recommendation category?

A) Case Management

B) Judicial Resources

C) Bail Reform / Police Powers

D) Federal Legislation Revision

E) Availability of Programs

E) Availability of Programs

300

The criticism regarding the Federal government's response 

Response is reactive rather than proactive

300

The year of this case

2016

400

Name one of the principles/goals that come out of R v Jordan

Enforcement & Accountability / Efficiency / Predictability & Safeguarding / Maintenance of Public Confidence 

400

The number of months for the ceiling of provincial courts

18 months

400

The name of the Justice who defined the "battle lines" of R v Jordan 

Justice Clifford

400

Is the presumptive ceiling prescriptive or descriptive according to the article?

Descriptive

400

The province in which Jordan was originally tried

British Columbia

M
e
n
u