Criminal Law
Contracts
Torts
Civil Procedure
Random
100

Using force or fear to derive someone of their property are elements of this crime 

Robbery

100

This type of offer will always reject the original offer as seen in Normile V. Miller

This also works in UCC if you see the words like "Only If" when talking about additional terms

Counter-Offer

100

If you are acting in _ then you can not be sued for a tort due to transferred intent 

Self defense

100

Under §1446 (b) if there are multiple defendants and they want to remove to federal court, they must all do this 

Consent or join in

100

If mens rea is not defined in a statute you must assume it is this one

Recklessness

200

Lying about your income reports to keep more money than you should will make you guilty of this crime

Larceny by false pretenses

200

§71-79 typically deal with this valuable term in contracts that both parties must exchange to each other

Consideration

200

Being confined with the threat of the cops being called, when they were not, is confinement by _

False legal authority

200

A party's citizenship is determined at this point in time, meaning a party can relocate after the event that gave rise to their claim and acquire new citizenship that creates or destroys diversity.




When the case if filed

200

Punishing someone for being an alcoholic is unlawful because it is punishing someone for their _

Status

300

In Lambert V. California, Lambert's conviction for failure to register was overturned because of lack of this

Fair Notice

300

You doing a lot of work after seeing an offer can lead to that offer not being able to be revoked due to this

Substantial performance

300

The first thing you must do before determining if you can use reasonable force to stop someone from trespassing is this 

Request the person to desist(Typically vocally)

300

Under §1332(c)(2) Suits brought by a legal representative will use the citizenship of this person

The person they are representing.

Usually a decedent, infant, or the incompetent

300

For Bi-lateral contracts, under this rule acceptance is effective upon dispatch if properly mailed

Mail-Box rule

400

These types of offenses(like drug possession) do not require a mens rea to be committed

Strict liability offenses

400

Under restatement §36 An offerees power of acceptance may be terminated by these four factors 

  • (a)rejection or counter-offer by the offeree, or

  • (b)lapse of time, or

  • (c) revocation by the offeror, or

  • (d) death or incapacity of the offeror or offeree.

400

Dispossessing one from using their movable property, leading to damage will likely leave you liable for this tort, just like Slender when he would not let a jockey's horse leave the stall

Trespass to chattel

400

Mottley introduced this doctrine that does not allow for federal jurisdiction to arise from a state law case that had an anticipated federal defense. §1331

The well pleaded complaint doctrine

400

In United States V. Jewell the defense of not being certain there was weed in the car did not work because the court said you can not have this

Deliberate ignorance

500

When you consciouslly desire something the mens rea is purposfully, but if you are aware something is substantially certain to follow from your conduct, regardless of desire, the mens rea is this

Knowingly

500

MYLEGS is an acronym for these types of contracts in the statute of frauds

Marriage, Year or more, Land, Executory, Goods(UCC), Surety

500

It is a duty to do this if it is safe for you to do so, if someone is presenting deadly force

Retreat

500

These are the exceptions where a judge can choose not to exercise supplemental jurisdiction under §1367(c)

  • Claim raises novel or complex issue of state law

  • Claim substantially predominates over the claim over which the district court has jurisdiction

  • The district court has dismissed all claims over which it has original jurisdiction

  • Exceptional Circumstances

 

500

Under §1441(b) A civil action otherwise removable solely on the basis of diversity jurisdiction may not be removed under these circumstances



If any of the defendants are a citizen of the state in which such action is brought.

M
e
n
u