A straight line that minimizes the sum of the residuals squares:
a) slope
b) y-intercept
c) least-squares regression line
c
(pokemon's predicted height) = 12 + 2(berries fed per day).
Interpret the slope:
For every increase of one berry, there is an expected height gain of 2 pounds.
The predicted change in the dependent variable (i.e., y) as the independent variable (i.e., x) changes:
a) y intercept
b) slope
c) residual
b
(pokemon's predicted height) = 12 + 2(berries fed per day).
Interpret the y-intercept:
If a pokémon eats zero berries tall, its height would be 12 inches.
The coefficient of determination (r^2) for a plot of values is 0.88. Is the correlation of the regression line (r) smaller or larger than this value?
It could be either 0.938 or -0.938, so the answer is either larger or smaller. These values are derived from taking the square root of the coefficient of determination. A negative correlation is plausible because when squared, it too yields a positive value.
The predicted value when the independent variable takes a value of zero:
a) slope
b) x-intercept
c) y-intercept
c
(pokemon's predicted height) = 12 + 2(berries fed per day).
R^2 = 88.2%. Interpret this in context of the problem:
88.2% of the variation in height can be accounted for by the least squares regression line of height on berries fed.
Name an independent and dependent variable with a correlation coefficient (r) of -0.8
The difference between what the line of best fit predicts for a given value of x and what the data actually shows.
a) correlation coefficient
b) outlier
c) residual
c
Individual points that substantially change the correlation or the regression line:
a) influential observation
b) outlier
c) residual
a
(pokemon's predicted height) = 12 + 2(berries fed per day).
Find the predicted height if one eats 7 and a half berries.
12 + 2(90) = 202 inches