Self-Reference Effect Basics
Representative
Research
Factors Behind Self-Reference Effect
Meta-Analysis Findings
Experimental Considerations
100

What is the self-reference effect?

The tendency to remember information better when relating it to oneself.

100

Why does self-referential processing lead to better memory encoding?

It creates a more meaningful and distinctive memory code.

100

Name one cognitive factor that makes self-reference effective.

The self provides a rich set of distinctive cues.

100

How many studies were included in their meta-analysis?

129 studies.

100

According to Foley et al. (1999), what experimental issue might underestimate the self-reference effect?

Participants may "cheat" and use self-referential processing even when instructed to use shallow processing.

200

Self-reference tasks encourage this type of processing.

Deep processing.

200

Which type of processing resulted in the highest recall?

Self-reference processing.

200

How does elaboration contribute to the self-reference effect?

It connects personal traits, improving retrieval accuracy.

200

What research method did Symons & Johnson (1997) use to study the self-reference effect?

Meta-analysis.

200

In the Foley et al. (1999) study, what two types of mental imagery were compared?

Visualizing an object and imagining using the object.

300

According to the self-reference effect, are people more likely to recall words that apply to them or words that don’t?

Words that apply to them.

300

In T.B. Rogers’ (1977) study, what four types of processing did participants use?

Visual, acoustic, semantic, and self-reference processing.

300

How does rehearsal play a role in self-referential memory?

Associating information with oneself leads to more frequent and complex rehearsal.

300

What did the meta-analysis confirm about self-reference processing?

It leads to significantly better recall than semantic or other processing methods.

300

What surprising result did Foley et al. (1999) find when analyzing recall?

Recall rates were identical (42%) for both visualization and self-reference conditions.

M
e
n
u