Rosecrance
Moravcsik
Keohane
Compare to Realism
100

Two ways to gain power

What are hegemony and trade?

100

Three factors that determine state preferences

Identity, market forces, and domestic political institutions/bureaucracy

100

What are externalities?

Externalities occur when “actors do not bear the full costs, or receive the full benefits, of their own actions”

100

Who are the key actors in liberalism vs. realism?

Institutions vs. states

200

Two ways war can happen, even when states have a lot of power.

What are ideology and rally-around-the-flag effects?

200

Three levels of liberalism (and how they interact)

Unit level (private entities) actors have a set of preferences, which are represented at the state level (via political institutions), and the filtered set of preferences determines actions at the systemic level (state behavior).

200

What solve externalities?

Regimes

200

What do states want in liberalism vs. realism?

Material goods vs. Power (offensive R) or survival (defensive R)

300

Why trade helps prevent war

Trade creates interdependence.

300

Why liberal theory is necessary

It's more comprehensive than realism

300

What are the benefits of regimes?

Solve externalities through: Mutual expectations, working relationships, reduced transaction costs, enforcement mechanisms, clustering of related issues, resolve information asymmetry by establishing reputations and sometimes providing transparency mechanisms.

300

What causes conflict in liberalism vs. realism?

Regime failures vs. self-help

400

This helped prevent war after WWII.

MAD, uncertainty

400

The difference between liberalism according to Moravcsik and constructivism

They are quite similar! The difference (primarily) is that Moravcsik is focused on institutions and still views state behavior as coming from a unitary actor -- it's just that the behavior is influenced by lower-level agents. Constructivism sees this agents as having their own ability to take action in the international system.

400

Why do states comply with regimes?

Existing regimes are valuable. Even if all states would prefer an alternative regime, creating a new one is very costly. Regimes also impose reputational costs—states need to be able to continue to negotiate with other states in the future.

400

What is the role of human nature in liberalism vs. realism?

In realism: Human nature is inherently violent (classical realism), or human nature doesn’t matter, only state power matters (neorealism)

In liberalism: Humans want to maximize their own goods, but to do so, they can cooperate and create structures to govern competition

500

This is the system of gains that makes trade beneficial (and an explanation of why.)

Trade means that every state increases its power; this is a problem if we’re in a relative gains world, since power is only measured vis-à-vis other states, but in an absolute gains world, the reciprocity associated with trade is good, because power is measured by material factors.

500

Where do state interests come from, and how does this differ from other theories we've discussed?

Domestic preferences; Moravcsik says little about how anarchy shapes those preferences (like realism does) or how interactions between states shape them (like constructivism does)

500

Name a regime and explain how it solves an externality. 

Many answers.

500

What are the core concepts and beliefs in liberalism vs. realism: 

Realism: Power, conflict, state aggression, weakness of institutions

Liberalism: Cooperation, interdependence, democracy-promotion, globalization

M
e
n
u