Describe a correlation of -0.9 in terms of strength (weak, moderate, or strong) and direction.
Strong, negative.
Two variables produce a negative correlation. How will this affect the slope?
The slope will be negative.
The linear model for a local store's Number of Sales people working versus Sales is as follows: Sales = 8,106 + 91.34Number of Sales People Working. What is the y-intercept?
$8,106
R2 has a value of .81 for the relationship between two variables. What is the value of r?
Can not be determined (either +.9 or -.9)
An analysis of Math SAT versus Verbal SAT scores gives an equation of Predicted Verbal SAT Score = 171.333 + 0.6943*Math SAT Score. What would you predict someone's verbal score to be if they got a 520 on their Math section?
What is 532.369
What is one point that all linear regression equations should go through?
(meanx, meany) ....Look at the equation to calculate the y-intercept!
A restaurant's menu items are compared in terms of correlation. Sugar versus Calories has a correlation of 0.25. Sugar versus Protein has a correlation of -0.68. Which has a stronger correlation?
Sugar versus Protein.
Predicted Price = 18.617 + 103.929 Capacity. This is the regression equation for disk space Capacity versus Price at a local store. What is yhe meaning of the y-intercept? (And does it make sense?)
A disk with 0 capacity would be expected to cost $18.61. No, no one would buy a disk with zero capacity.
The linear model for a local store's Number of Sales people working versus Sales is as follows: Sales = 8,106 + 91.34*Number of Sales People Working. What does the slope mean in this situation?
For every increase of 1 sales person working, sales increase by $91.34.
The linear model for a local store's Number of Sales people working versus Sales is as follows: Sales = 8,106 + 91.34*Number of Sales People Working. What is the meaning of the y-intercept and does it make sense?
If no salespeople are working, we'd expect to make $8,106 in sales. No, when no one is working, there should be no sales. This is just a starting point for the data.
The r2 value for GDP and "crowdedness" (number of people per room in homes) has a value of 0.46. What does this mean?
46% of variation in crowdedness can be explained by the relationship with GDP.