Kofer
someone is obligated to pay Kofer if his __________ went and ____________ a person
animal killed
If someone stole money then he must ______ back or if he can't then he must be ___________
pay sold
The case of zummified eidim admitting is where they were zummified in Beis Din but not yet ____________ and they _________ away and then __________ in another Beis Din that they were already ____________
punished ran admitted zummified
Rav said that a _____________ witness must pay according to his _____________
zummified portion
2B - LINE 29
מַאן
Whom
_________ ____ and the ________ ________ argue if you pay the value of the Nizik or the __________
Rebbe Yishmael Tanna Kamma Mazik
If Eidim testified falsely that someone stole and then became zummified, they are not __________
sold
There are 2 types payments in the Torah
1) Money (Paying back)
2) _______ - Paying more than what you did
kenas
the gemara suggests ____ different answers to explain Rav's statement
5
2b - Line 36
ואין נמכרין בעבד עברי
and they are not sold as slaves
According to Rav Chisda: Rebbe Yishmael holds that Kofer is a __________ (sefardim pronounce this word more geshmak) and that's why he must pay the value of _____________
Kappara himself
When are Zummified Eidim not sold as slaves:
There are 4 situations - List them:
Accused Eidim
1) No $ No $
2) No $ $
3) $ No $
4) $ $
The difference between a 1) money payment versus a 2) kenas payment is that:
By a ________ payment if he __________ then he is potur from paying
kenas admits
Rule: a zummified witness does not need to pay unless the other witnesses were also _______________
zummified
2b - Line 44
וקנס
and a penalty payment
According to Rav Pappa: Rebbe Yishmael and the ________ _________ both hold that Kofer is a __________ but they argue about how much to pay in order to ______________ himself from heavenly death
Tanna Kamma Kappara redeem
There are 3 different opinions of when the Zummified Eidim are not sold as slaves:
Rav _____________ #1
Rav _____________ #2
_________
Rav Hamnuna
Rav Hamnuna
Rava
according to Rebbe __________, the punishment of eidim zommimin is a __________, therefore if the eidim admit, then they are potur
Rebbe Akiva kenas
Rule: any witness that said testimony in beis din can not ___________ his testimony
change
3a - Line 3
משלם לפי חלקו
pays according to his portion
According to Rav Pappa:
1)Which opinion does not seem to make sense?
2) What is the explanation for this opinion?
1) The tanna Kamma because if it's a kappara then you should pay the value of mazik
2) A gezeira shava
In Which of the 4 cases are the Zummified Eidim not sold according to each opinion:
Rav Hamnuna #1
Rav Hamnuna #2
Rava
R"H #1 - When Accused has no $
R"H #2 - When accused and Eidim have no $
Rava - Never
Both Rabba and Rav Nachman say the same reason why the punishment of eidim zommimin is a kenas. What is the reason?
since they did not cause any harm and they are still punished. They are paying more than they did.
What is the final answer to explain Rav's statemnt
if one witness admits that he and the other witness were zummified and obligated to pay in another beis din
3a - Line 14
ס"ד אמינא
I would have thought