Relevance and its Limits
Witnesses
Opinions and Expert Testimony
Hearsay
100

401: Relevance 

(a) it has any tendency to make a fact more or less probable than it would be without the

evidence; and

(b) the fact is of consequence in determining the action.

100

602: Need for Personal Knowledge 

Cannot testify to something outside their personal knowledge; cannot delve into the mindset of someone else

100

702 (a and b)

(a) the expert’s scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge will help the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue;

(b) the testimony is based on sufficient facts or data;

100

801: What is hearsay and what isn't

Hearsay is a statement made by a declarant out of court, brought into court for the truth of the matter asserted either oral, nonverbal, or written; a statement by a party opponent or a co-conspirator 

200

403: Excluding Relevant Evidence

The court may exclude relevant evidence if its probative value is substantially outweighed by a danger of one or more of the following: unfair prejudice, confusing the issues, misleading the jury, undue delay, wasting time, or needlessly presenting cumulative evidence.

200

607: Impeaching a witness

May attack the witness's credibility if they are lying

200

702 (c and d)

(c) the testimony is the product of reliable principles and methods; and

(d) the expert’s opinion reflects a reliable application of the principles and methods to the facts of the case.

200

803.3 Then Existing State of Mind

A statement of the declarant’s then-existing state of mind (such as motive, intent, or plan) or emotional, sensory, or physical condition (such as mental feeling, pain, or bodily health), but not including a statement of memory or belief to prove the fact remembered or believed unless it relates to the validity or terms of the declarant’s will.

300

404: Character Evidence

Evidence of a person’s character or character trait is not admissible to prove that on a particular occasion the person acted in accordance with the character or trait.

300

611: Leading questions (what are they and when can they be used)

A close-ended question; can only be used on cross

300

701: Laywitness Testimony 

Based on the witness's rationally based perception, not based on scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge, helpful to understanding the witness's testimony or to determining a fact in issue

300

803.2 Excited Utterance 

A statement relating to a startling event or condition, made while the declarant was under the stress of excitement that it caused.

400

405: Methods of Proving Character

By reputation, opinion, and specific instances of conduct

400

608: What does it allow you to testify about a witness and how can you do that

Can testify to a witness's character for truthfulness if their only if their character for truthfulness has been attacked; using reputation, opinion, and specific instances

400

703: Bases of an Expert Testimony

An expert can testify to otherwise inadmissible evidence so long as an expert in the field would reasonably rely on those facts or data to make their conclusion

400

803.1 Present Sense Impression

A statement describing or explaining an event or condition, made while or immediately after the declarant perceived it.

500

406: You can testify that someone acted in accordance to…

A habit or routine

500

1002: Best Evidence

When someone testifies to the facts/content of a document that would be best represented by an exhibit

500

705: Disclosing Facts or Data Underlying

An expert may state an opinion with reasons for it without testifying to underlying facts or data

500

804: What is it

Exceptions and Criteria for unavailable witness's statements

M
e
n
u