Water's Edge & Mitigation
Structural or Non-Structural Mitigation
Codes, Infrastructure & Protection
Assess- ments
Planning Basics
100

In Water’s Edge, why did New Braunfels argue against restricting building along the river?

Tax revenue

100

Retrofitting my house to better withstand an earthquake.

Structural

100

Instituting and enforcing strong building codes is an example of what?

Non-Structural Mitigation

100

This assessment helps prioritize probabilities and consequences.

Risk assessment

100

This outlines an action for achieving a goal.

Procedure

200

After the 1998 Central Texas flooding, most federal emergency assistance was used to do this.

Rebuild in harm’s way

200

Changing my password every six months.

Non-Structural

200

This federal agency oversees about a third of the nation’s levee systems.

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers


200

This assessment helps identify strengths and what can actually be addressed with available resources.

Capability assessment

200

This may be a law, regulation, or formal statement of principles and expectations.

Policy

300

This general federal program supports state and local mitigation projects.

Hazard Mitigation Grant Program

300

Building a levee to keep floodwater out of a city.

Structural

300

The American Society of Civil Engineers usually gives U.S. infrastructure these kinds of grades.

Low grades

300

This assessment often uses maps and tools like HAZUS to see whether a community may be hit by a flood or earthquake.

Hazard assessment

300

Policies deal with organizational structures, personnel, and this.

Equipment and systems

400

This Trump-era mitigation program has been suspended, creating funding problems for states.

Building Resilience Infrastructure and Communities (BRIC)

400

Wearing a mask during a pandemic.

Non-Structural

400

This U.S. code consolidated fragmented regional and hazard-based codes.

International Building Code


400

This assessment points to differential impacts and the challenges faced by specific groups.

Social vulnerability assessment

400

Planning can best be described as this.

A process

500

Research often shows that every $1 spent on mitigation saves about this much in disaster losses.

About $6

500

Elevating a home by 10 feet in a floodplain.

Structural


500

Reinforced protective space designed for high winds and projectiles.

Safe room

500

This assessment asks how much risk a community will tolerate and how much mitigation it will pay for.

Loss estimation


500

Training and exercises progress based on capabilities and this.

Complexity

M
e
n
u