Actus Reus
Far Back
Mistake
Mens Rea
100

This case upheld a hate-crime penalty enhancement, ruling it punished conduct motivated by bias, not “thoughts.”


Wisconsin v. Mitchell


100

4 justifications of Punishment

1. Rehabilitation

2. Deterrence

3. Incapacitation

4. Retribution

100

Under common law, a specific-intent crime allows a mistake of fact defense if the mistake is ______, even if unreasonable.


'Honest'

100

Under the MPC, there are exactly four defined mental states. Name two.


Purposely, knowingly, recklessly, and negligently


200

A voluntary act is defined as this kind of bodily movement.


Conscious, willed bodily movement


200

What constitutional doctrine did the Supreme Court apply in Papachristou v. Jacksonville to strike down the vagrancy ordinance?


The void-for-vagueness doctrine under the Due Process Clause.

200

The official interpretation exception is also known as this...


Entrapment by estoppel


200

When a statute is silent on mens rea, the MPC’s default requirement is ______.


Recklessness

300

While Failure to act generally does not create liability unless one of these four exceptions applies.

1. special relationships, 

2. legal duties (by contract or statute), 

3. creating the risk, or 

4. voluntary assumption of care

300

What were the two principal justifications in Ewin? 

Deterrence; Incapacitation

300

People v. Marrero held that the interpretation of the statute was not a defense because ______.


It was not an official interpretation by someone of authority


300

What is the concept of deliberate failure to learn the truth, which can satisfy knowledge.


Willful blindness or deliberate ignorance


400

In State v. Decina, when was the 'voluntariness' element met? And when was it not met?


Met: Decision to drive

Not Met: Seizure causing crash

400

For Equal Protection strict scrutiny, the two elements are...


  1. The government must show a compelling governmental interest.

  2. The law or policy must be narrowly tailored (the least restrictive means) to achieve that interest.

400

This Model Penal Code section eliminates the distinction between specific and general intent and allows mistake of fact if it negates the required mental state.


MPC § 2.04(1)


400

In United States v. Yermian, the Court held that the mens rea did NOT apply to the ______ element of the false statement statute.


Federal jurisdiction element


500

Why did the Court find there was no legal duty in People v. Beardsley?

Their connection was limited to a short-term, illicit “weekend affair.”

500

What did the residual clause in §16(b) define crimes of violence as? 


Felonies involving a “substantial risk” of force.

500

Strict liability crimes do not allow a mistake-of-law defense because they lack this element.

Mens rea

500
What are the two things (that we learned) in which the legislation can impose strict liability

Public Welfare / Regulatory Offenses

Aggravating factors for enhanced sentencing

M
e
n
u