Legal Principles
R v Creighton
R v K (T)
R v Hughes
R v Roy
100

the act of culpable homicide where the person who causes the death of a human being means to cause his death or means to cause him bodily harm that he knows is likely to cause his death, and is reckless whether death ensues or not is one element of this crime


What is murder?

100

manslaughter under s.222(5)(a) of the criminal code and trafficking under section 4(1) of the Narcotic Control Act

what are Creighton's alleged crimes? 

100

this Act governs the prosecution and sentencing of offenders under the age of 18

what is the Youth Criminal Justice Act?

100

the main offence Hughes was alleged to have committed.

what is criminal negligence?

100

the standard of proof required to prove dangerous driving.

what is beyond a reasonable doubt? 

200

this offence is defined under section 219(1) of the Criminal Code. 

what is criminal negligence? 

200

what the particular person believed or intended to do versus what the reasonable person in the circumstance would do

what is subjective versus objective mens rea?

200

an act being _____________ is a consideration when determining whether unlawful act manslaughter has been proven, but it does not prove, in and of itself, the essential elements of the predicate offence or the reasonable foreseeability element

what is dangerous?

200

the elements of this type of causation include:

- whether the wrongdoer should answer for the consequences of their act because the outcome was intentionally produced or recklessly brought about

what is legal causation? 

200

The actus reus of this crime is driving in a manner that is unsafe to the public in regard to all the circumstances

what is dangerous driving (causing death)?

300

elements of this offence include: 

- an unlawful act that causes the death of another (actus reus)

- an intention that falls short of an intention to kill

- reasonable foreseeability of the risk of bodily harm (mens rea)

what is unlawful act manslaughter?

300

"the test should focus on objective foresight of serious bodily harm that is neither trivial nor transitory"

what is the majority decision on the objective test? 

300

to prove this offence, the Crown must identify the unlawful act that is being relied upon, prove the actus reus and mens rea beyond a reasonable doubt, and prove that the objective reasonable foreseeability of risk has been satisfied 

what is manslaughter?

300

this type of causation is concerned with how the victim came to their death with the contribution of the accused

what is factual causation?

300

distinction between _______ _________ (which can ground civil liability) and the ________ _________ (necessary for criminal liability must be identified

what is mere and marked departure?

M
e
n
u