PEEL BOARD V BW [1987]
MULTANI INFO
MULTANI: STATUTES AND REGULATIONS
MULTANI: RULING AND REASONING
ADDITIONAL RESOURCES
100

On which level of court did this case occur?

Ontario High Court of Justice

100

What year did the case take place?

2006

100

In this case, was the appellant's religious freedom violated under s/ 2(a) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms?

Yes!

100

What did the Supreme Court of Canada rule in this case?

Appeal should be allowed

Restore the ruling of the Superior Court of Quebec, allowing Gurbaj to wear his kirpan

100

For the purposes of policies on bullying prevention and intervention, school boards use a definition of bullying coming from what?

The Education Act

200

Name the appellants and respondents

Appellants: Robert Keel and John Goldsmith

Respondent: Robert Spence

200

What level of court was the case heard at?

The Supreme Court of Canada

200

Did the Court have to make a ruling on s. 15 of the Charter

No, as s. 2 was already violated, so this was not necessary to consider

200

Could, in this case, the infringement of rights be saved by s.1 of the Charter and why?

No, it cannot as it does not pass all 3 prongs of the Oakes test

200

Tinker v Des Moines Independent Community School District

In this case, the District Court recognized the teens wearing armbands as symbolic of expressing certain views according to which clause?

Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment

300

What is being questioned in this case?

The application of s. 38 of the Young Offenders Act to disciplinary proceedings taken by a school board

300

Who is the appellant and respondent?

Appellant: Mr. Multani (father, representing himself and his son)

Respondent: Commission Scolaire Marguerite Bourgeoys

300

Alongside the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, which other Charter was mentioned in this case?

The Quebec Charter

300

What was the dissenting/minority ruling?

This case is better dealt with using administrative law

300

Policy Memo 144:

What is the purpose?

To provide direction to school boards in revising policies and guidelines regarding bullying prevention and intervention

400

What was the judgement?

The mere fact that a student has been charged with an offence does not, by itself, establish a basis for disciplinary action under s. 22 of the Act or justify the peremptory and, indeed, arbitrary action taken by the board and its officials

400

Summarize the argument Mr. Multani presented

Son should be allowed to bring kirpan to school as it is his right to freedom of religion.  Not being able to do so infringes upon his rights under the Charter
400

Why would administrative law have to be considered?

Since the case involves an administrative body (the school board)

400

Alongside Gurbaj's freedom of religion being stripped, and because he was unable to wear his kirpan to school, what other basic right was the child deprived of?

The right to attend a public school

400

Tinker v Des Moines Independent Community School District

What was the legal question?

Does a prohibition against the wearing of armbands in public school, as a form of symbolic protest, violate the students' freedom of speech protections guaranteed by the First Amendment?

500

Why is this case significant?

It shows a value for children's right to safety

Places the law over people's moral decisions

500

What was Commission Scolaire's argument?

Kirpan should not be allowed as the safety of students must be prioritized

500

Did the school board believe that some religious practices do not merit the same practice as others?

Yes, the school board did believe this. The Supreme Court ruled that religious practices should be allowed if it does not cause harm

500

Explain the 3 prongs to the Oakes test, relevant to this case

Passes the 1st prong in that ensuring safety in schools is important

Passes the 2nd prong in that the decision is rationally connected to ensuring safety

Fails the 3rd prong in that the infringement is not of minimal impairment to the child

500

According to Policy memo 144 what are the characteristics of a positive school climate?

Positive school climate:

  • All members feeling safe, included, and accepted. 

  • All members of the school community demonstrate respect, fairness, and kindness in their interactions, building healthy relationships that are free from discrimination and harassment. 

  • Students are encouraged and given support to be positive leaders and role models in their school community. Open and ongoing dialogue takes place between the principal, staff members, parents, and students. All partners are actively engaged. 

  • The learning environment, instructional materials, and teaching and assessment strategies reflect the diversity of all learners. 

  • Every student is inspired and given support to succeed in an environment of high expectations. 

  • Bullying prevention and awareness-raising strategies for students and staff are reinforced through curriculum-linked programs.

M
e
n
u