500
Two traditional ethical theories that argue the judgment of right and wrong is based on (1) the nature of an action or (2) its consequences.
What is (1) NONCONSEQUENTIALISM and (2) CONSEQUENTIALISM
A consequentialist will argue that an action is right if the outcome is positive. Example: Speeding is okay if you get to work on time. If there is a negative outcome, such as a crash, then speeding is bad.
A nonconsequentialist will say that speeding is wrong no matter what, as it is risky and against the law.
Modified ethical theories also exist in patient care:
-Social contract theory: Certain persons or groups have relationships that contain inherent expectations or duties.
Ex. Patients and radiographers (Patients expect minimized radiation exposure from radiographers, and the radiographers expect patients to cooperate and remain still during exams. Unmet expectations could be viewed as a violation of the unwritten contract).
-Ethics of care: Right actions for one patient in one situation may be wrong for other patients or circumstances. AKA situational ethics.
-Rights-based ethics: Emphasizes the rights of individuals in a democratic society to be shielded from undue restriction or harm (the rights of some individuals place duties on others).
-Principle-based ethics: widely accepted standard in health care, based on six moral principles for guidance (beneficence, nonmaleficence, veracity, fidelity, justice, autonomy).