Everything Elections
All About The Law
The World....
So Much Evidence
It All Went Wrong
100

What are Elections

A Process enabling citizens to choose representatives to sit in a legislature and act as their delegates or trustees

100

What is Natural Justice 

Natural justice refers to the rules and procedures to be followed by any persons or groups that adjudicate any disputes between others about the rights of others

100

What system does france use 

Inquisitorial system

100

What parts of the constitution outline the separation of powers?

Chapters 1, 2, and 3

100
what am i, its something to do with impartial adjudication, its a case, even tho we have it in law people will still do it, what am i 

Juror misconduct, as jurors even with criminalisation of misconduct under section 56B under the Jury act 1957

200

Explain one difference between a delegate and trustee representatives

Delegates have more autonomy and will act on your behalfs whereas trustees will act directly on your behalf and not on others

200

Explain one difference between the 'onus of proof' and the 'standard of proof'

The Onus of proof is that the prosecutor and plaintiff must prove liability and guilt whereas standard of proof is to how much you must prove (beyond reasonable and balance of probabilities)

200

What is the US Election System

Presidential Election

200

What is the popular case that due to juror misconduct was thrown out
i need the year, name, and brief summary 

Lehrmann V DPP
2022
A sexual abuse case when Liberal Party Staffer alleged that she had been raped in 2019 by Bruce Lehrmann
and during the case it was discovered jurors had brought in research papers about sexual abuse which caused the case to be thrown out and prosecution would give up the case

200

What is a nuance of mandatory sentencing

removes judicial discretion by requiring judges to impose a fixed sentence

300

Explain ONE reason why political rights are important in a liberal democracy

These rights are needed to allow citizens to self govern

300

Explain two differences between summary and indictable offences and one example of each

Differences may include:
Summary are minor offences
Summary are determined in the magistrate court
Summary do not involve juries
e.g Assault, Theft (total is under 50k), Disorderly Conduct, traffic infractions
Indictable are more serious offences
Indictable is dealt by the District and supreme courts
Indictable is prosecuted by DPP,
Indictable usually involves a jury
E.g Murder, Theft over 50k, 

300

Explain the advantages and disadvantages of non-compulsory voting

Ads:
Allows more freedoms of the people as they have the right to not vote
Decreases uninformed voters
Cons:
Minorities can be oppressed
Decreases Political Knowledge of state

300

Which of the following sections of the constitution relates to the maximum year term for House of Representatives:
Section 24
Section 28
Section 76

Section 28

300

What am i, I have something to do with electoral laws, my root of the problem is section 7 of our constitution, and effects the weight of voters 

malapportionment

400

What is Australia's voting system and their advantages and disadvantages

Compulsory voting
Advantages inc:
High turnout
maximises mandates
minimises influence of polarising ideas
Disadvantages inc:
May lead to uninformed voting
infringe on the right not to vote

400

Explain one role of the jury in a criminal trial 

Their role is to listen to the evidence and determine the facts and provide a verdict of guilty or non-guilty 
400

What are the advantages and disadvantages of inquisitorial system 

ADS:

•Bringing forth evidence

•Witnesses hold less bias

•Lower cost for the parties

•More likely to convict a guilty offender
CONS:

•Disproportionate power held by an active judge

•Lower quality of evidence

•Parties have less control

•The character of the defendant is included

•Over reliance on one person’s skill

•Weaker separation of judicial and executive power

•Weaker protection of the rights of the accused

400

I'm a Poor Pnl student and i need evidence to support my argument that Australia is failing in preventing misscarriages of justice 

Accept the following:
Andrew mallard
Lehrmann

read textbook to see if their answer works

400

Out of these three phrases which one is a nuance

1."Judicial independence ensures neither legislative and executive can affect the courts"
2."Compulsory voting may cause uninterested voters to be affected"
3."I'm not a big fan of the government"

2

500

Outline two features of proportional representation voting

Give it for:
Multi-member electorates
Each state/territory is a single electorate
Each state has 12 representation
each territory electorate has 2

500
List the entire Criminal Trial Procedure for Indictable Offences
1.Prosecution opening address

2.Defence opening address
3. P=Examination in chief
4. P= Cross examination
5. P= Re-exam
6. Close of PC
7. D= Examination of chief
8. D= Cross Examination
9. D= Re-exam
10. P= Closing address
11. D= Closing address
12. Charging the jury and verdict

500

explain the entire NZ election system in detail
btw if u get this write u win

Im not writing allat twin

500

Yo yo i do politics and law do you think my evidence supports my argument: Common law and natural justice advantages: "Section 71 outlines the powers given and enshrine in law that common law can fill in the gaps that statute can't cover"

YES

500

Name two nuances of adversarial and inquisitorial trial systems 

•Disproportionate power held by an active judge

•Lower quality of evidence

•Parties have less control

•The character of the defendant is included

•Over reliance on one person’s skill

•Weaker separation of judicial and executive power

•Weaker protection of the rights of the accused


Adversarial system: 


  • Winning Over Truth

  • Socioeconomic Disparities

  • Passive Judge Role:

  • Trauma and Emotional Toll
  • High Costs and Delays
M
e
n
u