Facts about Potter's Case
Application of Precedent
Rules
Preceding Cases
100

The Issue of the Potter case

What is Under the New Hampshire Dui Statute would Dr. Potter’s actions be considered driving beyond a reasonable doubt?

100

Potters dissimilarity to Winstead and Holloran

What is in Winstead, the defendant unlocked the door, pushed the clutch in, moved the gear selector to neutral, started the engine and turned on the heater?

And in Holloran, the defendant showed he had an intent to drive while intoxicated due to the fact that he said he was waiting on a call from his wife to pick her up. Although Potter did not meet these standards he still showed he was in control of the vehicle?

100

New Hampshire statute for DUI  

What is No person shall drive or attempt to drive a vehicle upon any way or attempt to operate an OHRV while under the influence 265-A:2?

100

 The Relevant cases

what are State v. Holloran and State v. Winstead?

200

The likely result of the Potter case.

What would be a court finding that the act of sleeping in the driver’s seat, with the lights on and keys in the ignition, constitutes as “driving” therefore Dr. Potter act of being intoxicated falls under New Hampshire’s DUI statute?

200

 Potters Similarity to Winstead

What is like the defendant in Winstead, who was found asleep in the driver’s seat with the lights on and keys in the ignition, here, Dr. Potter was found in the driver’s seat with the lights on and keys in the ignition indicating he had actual physical control of the motor vehicle?

200

The two sub-rules of the relevant cases

What are

If a person is in the driver's seat plus willing and able to put the keys in the ignition, turn on the heat, touch the shift gear, and has driven or was planning to drive the vehicle on a public way, that person has exercised domain over said vehicle.

 And

Operating a vehicle can occur before falling asleep if steps before consist of exercising domain?

200

This Defendant was found guilty of a DUI in New Hampshire while in drivers seat, keys were in the ignition, and intent to drive while being intoxicated

Who is Holloran?

300

What case found not to relevant to Potter’s case

What is State v. O’Malley?

300

Potter's similarity to Holloran

What is like the Defendant in Holloran, who was in actual physical control of his truck, even when the truck was legally parked and the engine off, here, Dr. Potter is in actual physical control of his truck, notwithstanding that his car was parked and engine was not running?



300

This act is defined by in all its moods and tense, shall mean to operate or be in actual physical control of a motor vehicle

 What is Driving?

300

This Defendant from New Hampshire was found to have actual physical control of the car before falling asleep because the motor was running, was in a parking lot, gear in neutral, started engine and had heater on.

Who is Winstead?

M
e
n
u