Valid conveyance via stringing together the letters.
What is Metzger v. Miller?
100
Private property could be taken for public use/purpose with just compensation?
What is Berman v. Parker?
200
D has the interest in the fish.
What is Young v. Hichens?
200
P did not acquire ownership of the land via adverse possession.
What is Winchester v. Poretto?
200
Items in safe deposit box were not a gift?
What is Hocks v. Jeremiah?
200
BONUS: A degree is not marital property
What is Mahoney v. Mahoney?
200
Legislative act went beyond regulation and constituted a taking. The homeowner only owned rights to the surface, thus Penn Coal could not exercise its valuable rights under the act.
What is Penn Coal v. Mahon?
300
State does not own wild animals.
What is Commonwealth v. Agway?
300
D must remove the encroachment - no adverse possession
What is Peters v. Archambault?
300
Painting is D's
What is Gruen v. Gruen?
300
M was the owner of the land via an executed parol gift.
What is Hayes v. Hayes?
300
Regulation was not a taking - distinguished from precedent
What is Keystone v. DeBenedictis?
400
D stole the fish.
What is State v. Shaw
400
P was the owner of the land via adverse possession
What is Monroe v. Rawlings?
400
All of the elements of a gift were present, so the bonds were a gift
What is Welton v. Gallagher?
400
Property was properly conveyed to the bank as collateral for son-in-law's defaulted, as the escrow agent had been designated by A.M. and gave the deed to son-in-law.
What is Micklethwait v. Fulton?
400
State can use eminent domain powers to redistribute concentrated property ownership to a larger group of people.
What is Hawaii v. Midkiff?
500
Silver fox escaped and D takes possession of it (and its pelt).
What is Stephens & Co. v. Albers?
500
No adverse possession
What is Mendonca v. Cities Oil
500
No valid gift.
What is Bickford v. Mattocks?
500
P is the proper owner of the property, as Ds did not offer valuable consideration to be considered the purchasers of the land whose interest trump P's.
What is Hood v. Webster?
500
Test of whether a governmental regulation substantially advances a legitimate state interest is irrelevant to determining whether the regulation effects of an uncompensated taking of property in violation of 5A.