A care provider facility must designate this individual with sufficient time and authority to oversee the facility's efforts to comply with Part 411.
PSA Compliance Manager
A missing PSA training certificate was obtained and placed in the employee's file.
correction
Corrective Action: All affected staff will complete PSA refresher training.
Training curriculum.
Training sign-in sheets/certificates/completion records.
Staff were reminded to follow PSA policy.
No, this response is too vague and does not identify a specific corrective action, responsible party, monitoring process, or method for preventing recurrence
You review your training tracker and notice that an employee's required PSA training is approaching its due date. No one else has noticed.
Question: What should you do?
Take proactive action to ensure completion before the deadline and document/track completion rather than waiting for the employee to become noncompliant.
Under § 411.41, a facility must complete its standardized assessment for risk of sexual victimization and abusiveness within this many hours of a UC's arrival.
72 Hours
The PSA Compliance Manager created recurring calendar reminders to identify upcoming PSA training requirements.
corrective action
Corrective Action: The PSA Compliance Manager will implement recurring calendar alerts for upcoming training requirements
Screenshots or records demonstrating the calendar alerts were created and scheduled
The PSA Compliance Manager will monitor training.
No, this response is incomplete because it does not explain how, how often, what will be monitored, or how completion will be documented
An allegation was appropriately reported to all required agencies. Two months later, you review the allegation file and find no evidence that anyone followed up regarding the status of the investigations.
Question: What should you do?
Initiate and document follow-up with the appropriate investigating agencies and establish/verify continued follow-up until investigation statuses are known.
Under 45 CFR Part 411, cross-gender pat-down searches of UCs are prohibited except under what circumstance?
Exigent circumstances
The facility provided the missing PSA orientation to the identified UC.
correction
Corrective Action: The program revised its PSA orientation materials to include all required reporting methods.
The revised orientation materials.
Evidence that the revised version was implemented.
Training curriculum on the new materials and sign-in sheets/certificates/evidence of completion.
"All leadership and administrative staff will be retrained on the requirement."
The audit finding resulted from a tracker that did not identify upcoming deadlines, not from staff misunderstanding the requirement.
No, because the corrective action does not address the identified root cause
Your facility receives a finding because several PSA orientations were completed late. Leadership proposes the following CAP:
“PSA Compliance Manager will retrain staff regarding PSA orientation requirements.”
Staff already knew the requirement—they simply had no reliable method of tracking upcoming due dates.
Question: What should you recommend?
Revise the CAP to address the actual process failure, such as implementing a tracking/alert mechanism, assigning responsibility for monitoring upcoming deadlines, and establishing a method for verifying timely completion.
Following a report of sexual abuse or sexual harassment, the facility must monitor for possible retaliation for how long?
For the remainder of the UC's stay in ORR custody
The facility revised its PSA Allegation Log to require the staff member completing each investigative follow-up to document the date, agency contacted, outcome, and staff initials.
corrective action
Corrective Action:
“The PSA Compliance Manager will conduct monthly reviews of UC files using (form) to ensure required PSA orientation and refresher documentation is complete.”
Question: What evidence would best demonstrate that this corrective action has actually been implemented?
Copy of the form.
Completed, dated monthly review/audit records showing the files reviewed, results of the review, and any identified deficiencies or follow-up actions
Corrective Action Plan:
“The PSA Compliance Manager will review the training tracker monthly and ensure all staff remain compliant.”
What important accountability component is still missing?
Documentation/evidence of the review and a process for addressing identified deficiencies
You are reviewing evidence before it is submitted to close a CAR. The CAP states that leadership will conduct monthly audits of PSA documentation. The only evidence provided is a blank audit checklist.
Question: Is the evidence sufficient?
No. The blank checklist demonstrates that a tool was created, but it does not demonstrate that the required monthly monitoring was actually implemented. Completed/redacted monitoring documentation would provide stronger evidence.
An allegation involves sexual abuse that allegedly occurred at another ORR care provider facility. Your facility receives the allegation. Part 411 requires your facility to notify ORR within this maximum timeframe.
24 Hours after receiving the allegation
The facility corrected the three deficient employee files, reviewed all active employee files for the same deficiency, implemented a tracking mechanism for future training requirements, and assigned the PSA Compliance Manager responsibility for monthly monitoring.
Both a correction and corrective action
Corrective Action:
“The facility will ensure that PSA-related responsibilities are clearly assigned and completed within required timeframes, including during staff absences or changes in leadership.”
Question: What evidence would best demonstrate that this corrective action is systemic and sustainable?
A written responsibility/delegation process identifying primary and backup staff, completed tracking records showing assigned tasks and due dates, and evidence of supervisory review verifying completion
An auditor finds that required investigative follow-up was not documented. The proposed CAP says:
“The PSA Compliance Manager received refresher training regarding investigation requirements, and the missing documentation was added to the UAC file.”
Would you approve this CAP?
No. It corrects the specific record and provides training, but it does not establish a systemic mechanism for ensuring future investigative follow-ups occur, are documented, are monitored, and have clear accountability.
A finding was corrected, staff were retrained, and supporting documentation was submitted. Six months later, the exact same deficiency occurs again.
Question: What does this tell you about the original corrective action?
The corrective action was not sufficiently sustainable or effective in preventing recurrence. The program should reassess the root cause and implement stronger systemic controls and ongoing monitoring.