Introduction
Rule V
Rule VI
Rule VII
Summary

### 100

Rules that have to do with the Quality of the statements in the syllogism.

What are Qualitative Statements?

Affirmative or Negative

### 100

No conclusion can follow from two Negative Premises.

What is Rule V?

### 100

Can you logically derive a negative conclusion from two affirmative premises? True or False

What is False.

### 100

Rule VII

What is Either premise is negative, the conclusion must also be negative?

### 100

The syllogism must comply with these 7 rules to be considered what

What is Valid

### 200

Amount of rules we have learned?

What is 7.

### 200

Rule V prevents

What is saying more in the conclusion than is contained in the premises?

### 200

Example of categorical syllogism breaking Rule VI

All (S) men are (P) mortals

All (P) mortals make (I) mistakes

Therefore, some things that make (I) mistakes are not (S) men

### 200

Premises are affirmative or negative

What is Negative?

### 200

The last set of rules are called

What is qualitative rules?

### 300

Name the Terminological Rules.

I. What is 3 and only 3 terms

II. What is the middle term must not occur in the conclusion?

### 300

We cannot establish a connection between the major and minor terms.

What is we have two negative premises?

### 300

The conclusion is true but what's wrong.

What is goes beyond the premises Justify

### 300

If either premise is negative the conclusion must be

What is negative

### 300

Rule V says and when violated we commit what fallacy

What is no conclusion can follow from two negative premises and Fallacy of exclusive premises

### 400

Quantitative Rules.

III. What is the term distributed in the conclusion and in the conclusion?

IV. What is the middle term distributed at least once?

### 400

Example of rule 5 in a categorical syllogism

No plants are animals

Some minerals are not animals

Therefore, some minerals are not plants

### 400

Fallacy this rule violates

What is the Fallacy of Drawing a negative conclusion from affirmative premises?

### 400

Just because we say that some are excluded from a group, it does not preclude the possibility that all may be. True or false

What is True

### 400

Rule VI says and when violated commits what fallacy

if two premises are affirmative, the conclusion must also be affirmative and the Fallacy of drawing a negative conclusion from affirmative premises

### 500

Qualitative Rules

V. What is no conclusion from two negative premises?

VI. What is the conclusion is affirmative from two affirmative premises?

VII. What is the negative premise the conclusion must be negative?

### 500

Fallacy rule V commits

What is Fallacy of Exclusive Premises?

### 500

Fallacy Rule VII commits

What is the Fallacy of drawing an affirmative conclusion from a negative premise?

### 500

Rule VII says and when violated commits what fallacy

What is if either premise is negative, the conclusion must also be negative and the Fallacy of drawing an affirmative conclusion from a negative premise?