This means based on no evidence or just making up theories?
What is speculation?
This position was elected with the second most votes
What is the Vice-President?
You should write these questions down as they will be on the quiz tomorrow. Put them on your review sheet.
What is thank you Mr. Larkin?
This is based on evidence or explaining the meaning of something from that evidence
What is interpretation?
The Federalists said that certain things were not stated directly in the Constitution but could still be done.
What are implied powers?
John Adams was a member of this political party
Gilad, Yehuda, Yaakov, Shmuel
What is your name?
Bias, background, training all impact this
What is how someone interprets evidence?
What is conclusions people reach?
This party was well liked in the South with anti-tariff and agricultural economy policies.
What is the Democratic-Republican party?
Democratic Republicans ran this candidate who would become Adams' VP
Who is Jefferson?
Should historical interpretations be trusted? Give one reason they should be trusted and one reason they should not be trusted.
What is I am writing this down and asking any questions as it relates to this questions?
This is your goal when it comes to history
What is form your own opinion?
Federalists were big on tariffs which was well liked in this area.
What is the North?
This election involved both parties having two men run in hopes of getting first and second for the same party
What is the election of 1800?
What is your opinion on the two political parties we learned about?
What is I will study and review their policies?
This causes interpretations to be less reliable
What is bias, speculation, lack of evidence?
This was a major issue in early elections because the President and Vice-President refused to work with each other.
What is being from opposite parties?
This mandated that distinct votes for President and Vice-President had to be cast
How did each party view the National Bank as related to the Constitution?
What is understanding implied powers versus a strict interpretation of the Constitution?