Nouns
ὁ ἄρχων
Translate in Ancient Greek: he/she/it
αὐτός/αὐτή/αὐτό
1) Can this stand alone as a sentence?
2) Do we need to state the subject?
βουλεύω
1) yes
2) no, the ending already incorporated the subject of the verb
Translate in ancient Greek: you show
δείκνυς
λύσω
ἡ ἐλπίς, τῆς ἐλπίδος: genitive plural
τῶν ἐλπίδων
Ὅς
Αὐτὸ ἐστὶ τὸ αὐτὸ φῶς
What is the syntactic function of the underlined word?
Subject of ἐστί
προστίθημι: 3rd person singular
προστίθησι
ἐλπίζω (i hope)
2nd person singular future indicative (+ translation)
ἐλπίσεις (you will hope)
Translate: τὸ φῶς
the light
Translate: OF these, TO those (n.)
Δίδως ἐλπίδας.
What is the syntactic function of the underlined word?
direct object of δίδως.
βουλεύω: 2nd person plural
βουλεύετε
θύω:
1st person plural future indicative (+ translation)
θύσομεν (we will sacrifice)
Ὁ ἡγεμών, τοῦ ἡγεμόνος: dative plural
τοῖς ἡγεμόσι
who did this?
1) translate the underline word
2) what type of pronoun is it?
1) τίς
2) interrogative
Ὁ ἡγεµὼν δίδωσι τοὺς ἄρχοντας τῇ πατρίδι.
What is the syntactic function of the underlined words?
Dative / indirect object to δίδωσι
Τranslate: we are and we say
ἄρχω (I rule)
2nd person plural, future indicative (+ translation)
ἄρξετε (you all will rule)
Translate in Ancient Greek:
The divinity of the contest
Ὁ δαίμων τοῦ ἀγῶνος
Fill in the blank with the relative pronoun:
κελεύω αὐτὴν, ___________ τὀν πόδα δίδωμι
ᾗ
why feminine singular > because αὐτήν which is the word it refers to is feminine, singular
why dative> because the verb of the relative clause (δίδωμι) takes 2 objects: one direct (in the accusative) and one indirect in the dative. The direct object is stated in the sentence (τὸν πόδα) and we are missing the dative
Ὁ παίς τοῦ αίῶνος κελεύει αύτό.
1) What does the case of the underlined words show?2) With which word is it connected?
1) possession
2) Ὁ παίς
THEY BOTH THROW BUT DIFFERENTLY
Ἵημι: 3rd person plural vs
ῥίπτω: 3rd person plural
Ἱᾶσι vs ῥίπτουσι
Ἵστημι:
1person singular future indicative
στήσω