Preparation
Questioning
Definitions
Overview
Action Items
100

How early should you arrive for a hearing? 

At least 15 minutes early?

100

Ask a question!

See PowerPoint 

100

a University employee designated by the Dean of Students Office to resolve Student Conduct Code violations.

Conduct Official 

100

Can "hearsay evidence" be considered? 

Yes 

100

designed to help the student to increase self-awareness of the appropriateness or inappropriateness of their  behavior.

Self-reflection

200

Who receives all documentation prior to the hearing? 

the Respondents and the Board 

200

What order should you question respondents? 

Any order! 

200

University’s faculty, staff, or student body can attend an Accountability Hearing; role is intended to comfort the Complainant or Respondent throughout the Accountability Hearing.

Support Person 

200

The indirect nature of evidence affects what?

Credibility

200

designed to help the student to increase knowledge of content regarding a specific topic or special issue.

Content Knowledge

300

All information surrounding student conduct cases is treated as...

...PRIVATE information.

300

How specific should your questions be for the witness? 

Very!!! 

300

to be completed by the Respondent at the conclusion of an Accountability Hearing or Remediation; assigned during an Accountability Hearing must be completed regardless of the Respondent’s agreement unless altered on appeal.

Action Items 

300

What does the majority have to be for voting? 

3 to 1 

300

designed to help the student to increase their self-awareness of the potential impact their behavior may have on relationships with others, academic major or course of study, or future career.

Impact on personal future

400

Who does the panel consist of? 

1 Conduct Official, 3 Students, & 1 Faculty/Staff 

400

What should you focus on asking about while asking questions?

Their behaviors, not them as a person 

400

applied in an Accountability Hearing that means that if the evidence demonstrates it is more likely than not that the student violated the Student Conduct Code, the student will be found responsible.

Preponderance of the Evidence

400

Who votes if there is a 2-2 vote amongst the board members 

The Conduct Official

400

designed to prevent subsequent violations of the Student Conduct Code or other University standards, up to and including separation from the institution.

Deterrence

500

Are Board members expected to uphold decisions, even if there are dissenting opinions? 

Yes, all Board members are expected to uphold all decisions of the Board, even if there are dissenting opinions.

500

What do you do when a Respondent immediately admits responsibility for a violation? 

address the Respondent’s perception of the seriousness of the violation and ask questions which clarify how the Respondent views the violation and potential consequences of their actions on the surrounding campus community.

500

an alleged victim of a Student Conduct Code violation.

Complainant

500

What is one Action Item and the reasoning? 

See PowerPoint

500

designed to help the student to increase their self-awareness of the potential physical or psychological impact of their behavior.

Impact on personal well-being

M
e
n
u