The Solution
Fidelity
Data
Teachers
Implementation
100
All SIG schools utilize this type of curriculum which details the percentage of time students work in the classroom (text) and the lab (software).
Blended Curriculum (60/40)
100
The practice of supporting high-quality implementation that sustain mathematics improvement which is a critical piece of effective implementation.
Implementation Fidelity
100
The number of status meetings held in one school year.
5
100
The number of "touches" each teacher receives per year.
10
100
An evidence-based hypothesis that defines the actions necessary to achieve a desired outcome. It is created during the 1st status meeting and then refined throughout the implementation during subsequent status meetings.
Theory of Action
200
Instruction that is focused on the student's needs, abilities, interests, and learning styles with the teacher as a facilitator of learning.
Student-Centered Instruction
200
When participants experience the model, become familiar with the teacher and student materials, and begin to learn how to effectively use report data.
Initial Implementation Training
200
The 4 of the 6 documents the MSP is responsible for completing for each status meeting.
SCR, Stoplight Matrix, IFR, PD calendar, and all ICS logs and Courtesy Emails
200
4 ways to increase Teacher Content Knowledge
Instructional Coaching, Content Academies, Custom PD, NMI
200
Under the SIG Model, we provide resources to encourage parent involvement in students in these 3 ways.
Family Math Night Homework Helper Skills Practice
300
Students who take three complete and consecutive years of Carnegie Learning’s math courses will pass their math class in the third year.
Guarantee
300
1/2 day training designed for building and district leaders who will be supporting teachers and students implementing the Carnegie Learning curricula.
Leadership Training
300
The 3 levels Carnegie Learning collects and analyzes click-stream data.
Student, Teacher and Demographic
300
The number of ICS logs that should be filled out for each visit to a SIG school.
1 per teacher, per visit
300
The number of hours a student should work in the software during each year of implementation
50
400
The number of years a school initially commits to the SIG model.
3 years
400
The 3 domains of effectiveness of the School Improvement Model.
Implementation Fidelity, Data-driven Accountability, Teacher Content Knowledge.
400
2 times per year, the MSP generates this for EACH teacher giving precise information relative to teacher implementation in the classroom.
IFR
400
The tool used to determine professional development needs of teachers. This tool is both used as a self-assessment by teachers, as well as a gauge of classroom implementation by the CL coach 2 times per year.
IFR
400
The 6 domains of effective software implementation
Lab Time, Lab Environment, Knowledge Tracing, Teacher Support of Student Learning, Student Engagement, Data-Driven Instruction
500
2 of the 3 levels of effectiveness in the School Improvement Model.
Implementation Fidelity, Data-driven Accountability, Teacher-Content Knowledge
500
The year suggested for a teacher (or math leader) to attend CIS training
Year 2 or 3
500
The partner who collects roster data, course grades, and assessment scores from schools as well as usage data from Carnegie Learning’s math teaching software. These data are combined to generate biannual reports shared during status meetings.
Empirical Education
500
Beginning with the 3 round of status meetings this year, all documentation of work with SIG teachers must be completed using this system.
Online Portfolio System
500
The 9 domains or effective classroom implementation
Classroom Environment, Planning and Pacing, Questioning Strategies, Making Connections, Classroom Discourse, Data-driven Instruction, Student Communication of Math, Student Collaboration, Student Engagement
M
e
n
u