Name 3 types of conformity
Compliance and internalisation
What task did participants perform in Asch’s study?
Line judgement task
What voltage did Milgram start at?
15 volts
What was one variable Milgram changed?
Uniform, proximity, or location
Define compliance.
Compliance = public agreement, private disagreement
What percentage conformed at least once?
75%
What was the highest voltage
450V
How did proximity affect obedience?
The closer the authority figure was to the person the more likely they were to obey
Describe the differences between compliance and internalisation.
Compliance - temporary, to fit in. Internalisation - long lasting, done out of a belief.
Name one factor that decreased conformity in Asch’s variations.
Presence of a dissenter
What % obeyed to the full 450V?
65%
How did uniform affect obedience?
Obedience dropped form 65% to 20% when the experimenter was wearing plain clothes.
Explain informational social influence and when it’s most likely to occur.
It’s the desire to be right—people conform when unsure what’s correct, especially in ambiguous or crisis situations.
Why did critics argue Asch’s findings lacked temporal validity?
The study was conducted in 1950s America, a highly conformist culture—results might differ today.
What qualitative data did Milgram collect? Give some examples
Sweating, trembling, stuttering, nervous laughter, and seizures.
How did location affect obedience in Milgram’s study?
Obedience dropped from 65% to 47.5% when the study moved from Yale to a less prestigious office building.
How does normative social influence explain why people conform even when they know something is wrong?
They conform to gain approval or avoid rejection, not because they believe the group is right.
How did group size influence levels of conformity in Asch’s variations?
Conformity increased with up to three confederates, then levelled off.
How did Milgram defend the ethics of his research?
He argued participants were thoroughly debriefed and most (83%) later said they were glad to have taken part.
Why do situational variables support a situational explanation of obedience?
They show that context—not personality—is key in influencing whether people obey orders.