Types of conformity
Asch
Zimbardo
Milgram
situational variables
100

Name 3 types of conformity 

Compliance, identification, internalisation 

100

What task did participants perform in Asch’s study?

Line judgement task

100

Where did Zimbardo’s study take place?

Stanford University basement

100

What voltage did Milgram start at?

15 volts

100

What was one variable Milgram changed?

Uniform, proximity, or location

200

Define compliance.

Compliance = public agreement, private disagreement

200

What percentage conformed at least once?

75%

200

What was Zimbardo’s dual role?

Prison superintendent

200

What was the highest voltage 

450V

200

How did proximity affect obedience?

The closer the authority figure was to the person the more likely they were to obey 

300

What’s the key difference between identification and internalisation?

Identification = temporary, internalisation = long-lasting change

300

Name one factor that decreased conformity in Asch’s variations.

Presence of a dissenter

300

Why was the study stopped early?

Escalating harm/distress among participants

300

What % obeyed to the full 450V? 

65%

300

How did uniform affect obedience?

Obedience increased with uniform (e.g., security guard)

400

Explain informational social influence and when it’s most likely to occur.

It’s the desire to be right—people conform when unsure what’s correct, especially in ambiguous or crisis situations.

400

Why did critics argue Asch’s findings lacked temporal validity?

The study was conducted in 1950s America, a highly conformist culture—results might differ today.

400

Identify and explain one major ethical concern in Zimbardo’s research

Lack of protection from harm—participants experienced psychological and emotional trauma.

400

What signs of distress did participants show during the study?

Sweating, trembling, stuttering, nervous laughter, and seizures.

400

How did location affect obedience in Milgram’s study?

  • Obedience dropped when the study moved from Yale to a less prestigious office building.


500

How does normative social influence explain why people conform even when they know something is wrong?

They conform to gain approval or avoid rejection, not because they believe the group is right.

500

How did group size influence levels of conformity in Asch’s variations?

Conformity increased with up to three confederates, then levelled off.

500

Evaluate the internal validity: were participants truly conforming or just acting?

Some argue demand characteristics led them to play roles; others believe behaviour was genuine, supported by emotional reactions.

500

How did Milgram defend the ethics of his research?

He argued participants were thoroughly debriefed and most said they were glad to have taken part.

500

Why do situational variables support a situational explanation of obedience?

They show that context—not personality—is key in influencing whether people obey orders.

M
e
n
u