Conformity
Obedience
Conformity the sequel
Research designs
Science inquiry
100

Name given to the actors who are instructed by the researcher to give wrong answers.

Confederates 

100

This role was always assigned to the naive participant via a rigged draw, forcing them to deliver punishments.

Teacher

100

Individuals conform because they are concerned about being rejected by the group.

Normative social influence

100

Establishes a cause-and-effect relationship.

Experimental

100

Data that can be statistically analysed.

Quantitative

200

In Asch's baseline study, this approximate percentage of participants conformed and gave a wrong answer at least once.

75%

200

In the original baseline experiment, this percentage of participants obeyed orders all the way to the maximum voltage.

65%

200

The individual conforms because they respect the group and believe they have more knowledge.

Informational social influence

200

Carried out over a long period of time.

Longitudinal

200

Descriptive data.

Qualitative

300

This psychologist proposed the three distinct types of conformity.

Herbert Kelman

300

Moving the experiment from prestigious Yale University to a run-down office building in Bridgeport altered this specific independent variable.

Legitimacy of the setting

300

Asch's research found that conformity increased along with group size but plateaued once the group reached this number of people.

Four
300

In-depth detailed study of an individual, group or event.

Case study

300

The use of chance procedures to assign research participants to different experimental conditions; every participant has an equal likelihood of being placed in any group.

Random allocation

400

This level of conformity occurs when someone changes their behavior to fit a social role or because they value membership in a specific group.

Identification

400

Being physically closer to the authority figure increases obedience.

Proximity of authority figure

400

When a group agrees on a particular viewpoint or action, it can strengthen conformity as dissenting opinions become less apparent.

Unanimity

400

Measures two or more variables to see if a statistical relationship exists between them.  

Correlational 

400

Population is divided into smaller, distinct subgroups based on shared characteristics, participants are then randomly selected in the exact proportion to their presence in the overall population

Stratified sampling

500

Making the lines closer in length alters this variable, which shifts the motivation to conform from normative to informational social influence.

Task difficulty/difficulty of the task

500

Occurs when an individual shifts responsibility to an authority figure, viewing themselves merely as an instrument for carrying out orders.

Agentic state

500

Percentage of participants who conformed when Asch introduced a single "dissenter" who gave the correct answer.

5%

500

Observational research design that analyses data from different groups of people at a single, specific point in time.

Cross-sectional

500

Ensuring a person's identity or personal data remains unknown vs ensuring a person's identity or personal data is not disclosed (leaked).

Anonymity vs Confidentiality

M
e
n
u