Conceptual Foundations
FBA Procedures
The Process
Preference and Reinforcer Assessments
The BAPS model
100

These are the four components of the discriminated operant

MO, SD, Behavior (response class, topography), SR+/-

100

This FBA procedure involves gathering information based on others' reports, rather than direct observation

Indirect FBA

100

This step of the Comprehensive FBA process is done in order to "clarify the referral questions and identify the behaviors that interfere with functioning"

Step 1: Identifying the problem

100

This assessment aims to identify stimuli that are likely to function as reinforcers

a stimulus preference assessment

100

BAPS stands for:

Behavior Analytic Problem-Solving

200

MOs have these two effects

Value-altering effects

Behavior-altering effects

200

These procedures involve systematic, direct observation of behavior under natural conditions

Direct Descriptive

200

This step includes developing operational definitions, obtaining baseline data , identifying individual variables, and formulating hypotheses about function

Step 2: Defining the problem

200

This uses experimental methodologies for evaluating whether preferred stimuli function as reinforcers.

Reinforcer assessment (analysis of reinforcer effectiveness) 

200

examples of these include patterns of thinking, feeling, and acting; biological/medical conditions; diagnoses

Personal Characteristics

300

This signals the availability of reinforcement

Discriminative Stimuli

300

These involve systematically manipulating environmental variables and directly observing/measuring the effects on behavior

Experimental analyses

300

This step might include utilizing case conceptualization tools to identify intervention needs, as well as engaging in team problem-solving discussions

Step 3: Exploring Solutions

300

This type of preference assessment requires individuals to make a series of selections between stimuli and yield hierarchical rankings of preference.

Paired (or forced) choice 

300

These specify the communication, academic, executive, adaptive living, social, and/or self-management concerns that contribute to the target interfering behaviors

Skill Delay/Deficits

400

This is "comprised of behaviors with varied topographies that are evoked by the same antecedent variables and yield a common effect on the environment"

Response class

400

Minimal disruption, provides information about naturally occurring events, and yields data on baseline levels on interfering behavior are advantages of which FBA procedure?

Direct Descriptive

400

An important question to consider for this step might be "What resources are needed?"

Step 4: Implementing Solutions

400

This type of of preference assessment requires the simultaneous presentation of several stimuli.  Once a selection is made, that stimulus is removed from the field, and the rest are presented.  This repeats until a clear hierarchy has been established

MSWO

400

"In the context of individual instruction in the special education classroom, novel and difficult tasks trigger aggressive behaviors that result in escape (i.e., termination of task expectations)" is an example of what?

A functional hypothesis statement

500

Name at least two parameters of reinforcement

Rate, magnitude, quality, delay, effort

500

Being susceptible to recollection errors such as the recency error, primacy error, error of exaggeration, and error of generalization are potential disadvantages of which procedure

Indirect procedures

500

This is the final step in the FBA process, and includes visual inspection of data, and the reiteration of the problem-solving process as needed.

Step 5: Monitoring Outcomes

500

This is a preference assessment that arranges for unrestricted, continuous access to a variety of items/activities and estimate preference on the basis of time allocation 

Free Operant PAs

500

Name all 8 components of the BAPS model

Interfering behavior, Context, personal characteristics, Skills delays/deficits, motivational triggers, sources of reinforcement, reinforcing consequences, and parameters of reinforcement

M
e
n
u