OMISSIONS & LEGAL DUTY
Actus Reus
MENS REA & CULPABILITY
MISTAKE & IGNORANCE
HOMICIDE GRADING & CAUSATION
100

General rule: failure to act is not criminal unless there is this.

What is a legal duty to act?

100

A crime’s external component can include conduct, causation, and this harmful outcome (“result”). 


What is the social harm/result?

100

This Latin maxim captures the idea that an act alone doesn’t make someone guilty without a guilty mind.

What is “Actus non facit reum nisi mens sit rea”?

100

At common law, mistake of fact in this type of crime must be reasonable to excuse. 


What is a general-intent crime?

100

Manslaughter is unlawful killing without this mental state traditionally associated with murder.

What is malice aforethought?

200

One of the 5 duty sources: a duty created by a parent-child or spouse relationship.

What is a status relationship?

200

Criminal liability generally requires this: a willed movement (not a reflex, spasm, or convulsion).

What is a voluntary act (volition)?

200

 mens rea is justified by both this “desert/blame” theory and deterrence/efficiency theory.

What are retributivism and utilitarianism?

200

Explain the "Moral Wrong" doctrine and how it impacts a mistake of fact defense.

Under this doctrine, if a defendant’s conduct—as they believed the facts to be—is still immoral or a "moral wrong," they are not excused by their mistake of fact. The intentional commission of an immoral act supplies the necessary blameworthiness to justify a conviction even if the actor's mistake regarding the legality of the specific act was reasonable

200

Voluntary manslaughter “heat of passion” requires sudden intense passion, adequate provocation, and this timing requirement. 


What is no reasonable cooling-off time?

300

One of the 5 duty sources: when you “take charge” of a helpless person and block others from helping.

What is voluntary assumption of care + secluding/preventing aid?

300

“Conduct includes a voluntary act” means liability can still exist if an earlier voluntary choice set up a later involuntary moment.

What is the MPC “inclusion” rule?

300

Ostrich” doctrine: deliberately avoiding the truth so you can claim you didn’t know.

What is willful blindness?

300

At common law, mistake of fact in this type of crime can be honest even if unreasonable (if it negates the required intent).

What is a specific-intent crime?

300

Modern alternative to rigid “heat of passion”: broader mitigation standard used by NY/MPC with a subjective-objective reasonableness view. 


What is Extreme Emotional Disturbance (EED)?

400

One of the 5 duty sources: when your conduct creates the risk of harm—even innocently or negligently

What is creating the risk?

400

This can count as an “act” if someone knowingly procured/received it or had time to terminate control of it

What is possession?

400

Under the MPC, “knowledge” can be shown by awareness of a high probability of a fact’s existence (unless you actually believe it doesn’t exist).

What is the MPC “high probability” standard for knowledge?

400

Doctrine: even a reasonable mistake may not excuse if the defendant intended an immoral act anyway.

What is the moral wrong doctrine?


400

In involuntary manslaughter, prosecution must prove this causation test; notes also mention liability if the act hastened death.

What is but-for causation (and acceleration theory)?

500

These are conditions that must exist alongside conduct/result (like “intoxicated” in DUI).

What are attendant circumstances?

500

The Constitution bars punishing this (e.g., “being” an addict), but allows punishing acts tied to it

What is status?

500

Scholars criticize strict liability as inefficacious, unjust, diluting moral force, and often due to careless drafting (plus civil/regulatory alternatives).

What are the main critiques of strict liability?

500

mistake is a defense if it negates the required mental state for an element.

What is MPC § 2.04(1)?

500

Felony-murder limitation test asking whether the felony is dangerous “in the abstract” versus under the “facts-of-the-case.”

What are the “in the abstract” test and the “facts-of-the-case” test?

M
e
n
u