Axioms & Complements
Union, Intersection & Decision
Conditional Reasoning
Mutual Exclusivity & Exhaustiveness
Probability Communication
100

Probability axioms.

Nonnegative, total=1, additive for disjoint events.

100

P(A∩B)=0

Mutually exclusive; handle independently.

100

Essence of conditional probabilities 

Focus analysis to relevant context; refine judgment.

100

Exhaustive events.

Union covers full sample space.

100

Reliability as  P(A)=0.9

High; sustain process, monitor drift.

200

Represent as 0≤P(E)≤1

Represents proportion; ensures logical consistency.

200

P(A∩B)>0

Overlap exists; coordinate responses.

200

P(A∩B)=P(A)×P(B)=0.1, causes this decision.  

No conditional adjustment is required in prediction or risk assessment.

200

The need for exhaustiveness

Guarantees no missing outcomes; total probability=1.

200

P(A)=0.1

 Rare but possible; include contingency.

300

Total probabilities > 1

Overlapping or incorrect event definitions.

300

P(A∪B)=P(A)+P(B) only possible

Only if disjoint.

300

 P(A|B)>P(A)

B increases chance of A; positive

300

Event categories overlap

Double-count; inflated probability sum.

300

Decision framing for P(A)=0.5

Uncertain; collect data or defer choice.

400

Adding probabilities for disjoint events A and B

No overlap term.

400

High P(A∪B)

Wide exposure; strengthen joint mitigation.

400

P(B|A)=0 decision

A rules out B; mutually exclusive cases

400

Example: mutually exclusive but not exhaustive.

Pass/Fail ignoring pending results.

400

Subjective probability.

Belief-based estimate absent full data.

500

Sum of all event probabilities

1; total certainty across sample space.

500

P(A∩B)=P(A)P(B)

Independence; no effect between A,B.

500

Conditional probability key in quality testing answer in IJD - Interpretation, Judgement, Decision

I - links the observed evidence (like a sensor reading, defect detection, or pass/fail outcome) to the likelihood of the underlying cause.

J - Quantifies diagnostic reliability — how much confidence to place in what was observed.

D - P(Defect | Test Fail)), quality teams can decide which units to rework, when to recalibrate sensors, or how to tighten process control limits — ensuring that decisions are based on evidence, not assumptions.

500

Partition events into exhaustive sets

Supports total probability & Bayesian updating.

500

Communicate uncertainty

Improve trust, prevent false certainty.

M
e
n
u