Supp JX
Erie Doctrine
Joinder Recap
Trial Recap
Discovery Recap
100

What is step one of Supplemental JX? 

28 USC 1367(a) and United Mine Workers v. Gibbs 

Does the additional claim share a CNOF with the original claim? 

100

What is the Erie Doctrine? 

Federal courts in diversity cases apply state substantive law and federal procedural law.

100

When can you join a party (permissive joinder)? 

1. same t/o 

2. common question of law or fact 

100

What are the types of voluntary and involuntary dismissal?

Voluntary dismissal 

1. notice (R.41)

2. stipulation 

3. court order 

Involuntary dismissal 

1. Plaintiff fails to prosecute 

2. Plaintiff fails to follow the rules 

3. R.12(b)(6) motion 

100

What are the three required disclosures? 

1. initial disclosure 

2. expert testimony 

3. pre-trial disclosure 

200

What is step two of supplemental JX? 

1. Is the original claim based solely on diversity JX? 

2. defendant or plaintiff? 

3. destroy diversity? 

200

What happens when federal law conflicts with state law? 

Hanna 

Use federal law if 

1. Valid/ constitutional  

2. Arguably procedural 

200

What is the difference between compulsory and permissive counterclaims?

1. compulsory-- same t/o, waivable 

2. permissive-- unrelated, unwaivable (must satisfy JX requirements) 

200

What is the standard for JML?

Weighing the evidence (not the credibility of witnesses). 

200

What can be discovered and what cannot be discovered? 

26(b) scope of discovery 

1. matter relevant to any claims or defenses, and 

2. non-privileged, and 

3. proportional to the needs of the case 

cannot discover 

1. work product (exception Hickman v. Taylor)

2. privileged matter (exception Hickman v. Taylor)

3. mental impressions, conclusions, legal theories, and opinions 

300

Does supplemental JX require parties to meet the AIC requirement. 

No, but complete diversity is required for plaintiffs

Exxon Mobile Corp v. Allapattah Services 

300

What happens if a federal practice conflicts with a state practice? 

Analyze the twin evils 


300

What is the difference between impleader and required parties? 

impleader-- defendant adding a party, claiming they are responsible (indemnification or contributory) 

Required parties-- defendant files a 12(b)(7) and the court orders the parties to be added to the suit. The court cannot fairly and adequately resolve the dispute without them. 

300

What are the three categories of error that may trigger a new trial? 

1. weight of evidence 

2. process errors 

3. new evidence 

300

What are your discovery tools? 

1. required disclosures 

2. depositions 

3. interrogatories 

4. request for documents 

5. physical and mental examinations 

6. request for admissions 

400

In a diversity claim, can the defendant join nondiverse plaintiffs? 

No supplemental JX if complete diversity is destroyed. 

400

What are the twin evils? 

1. Forum shopping impact 

2. impact on inequitable administration of justice 

400

What are the two types of interpleader?

1. 28 USC 1335(a)-- $500 or more, minimal diversity, bond 

2. R.22-- AIC> $75K, complete diversity 

400

What are the standards of review? 

1. de novo-- question of law 

2. clearly erroneous-- fact finding by judge 

3. abuse of discretion-- discretionary orders 

4. reasonableness-- jury trial 

400

What are your tools for controlling discovery? 

1. R.26(g) sanctions

2. Objections 

3. Spoliation 

4. R.26(c) protective orders 

500

What is step three in supplemental JX (court considerations)? 

28 USC 1367(c)

1. novel/complex issue of state law? 

2. the claim substantially predominates over the original claims? 

3. The original claims have been dismissed? 

4. Other compelled reasons based on exceptional circumstances 

500

In a diversity case, what state law should be applied? 

Klaxon 

A federal court in a diversity case should apply the substantive law that would be applied by the state courts in the state in which the federal court sits. 

500

What are the two types of intervention and how do you meet them? 

1. Intervenors as a matter of law (timely, interest, impair or impede, UNLESS adequately represented)

2. Permissive intervenors (common question of law or fact and no undue delay or prejudice) 

500

How do you apply the 7th amendment to new statutory rights? 

1. is the claim analogous to one that would have been brought in equity or at law under traditional practices? 

2. does the plaintiff seek relief that was traditionally available at law or in equity?

500

When can you modify a scheduling order? A final pretrial order? 

1. good cause 

2. to prevent manifest injustice 

M
e
n
u