Intentional Torts
Defenses to Intentional Torts
Negligence
Defenses to Negligence
But Wait, There's More!
100

Elements of battery

Intent to cause a harmful or offensive contact with another's person, and a harmful or offensive contact results

100

Defense of self and others must be

Reasonably believed necessary under circumstances and proportionate to harm threatened

100

The default objective standard of care

Reasonable Care

100

Umbrella term for applying fault to plaintiff and its own standalone system

Contributory Negligence

100

Res Ipsa Loquitur means

"The thing speaks for itself"

200

Elements of assault

Intent to cause apprehension of a harmful or offensive contact, and victim is placed in apprehension of an imminent battery

200

Mistake is allowed as defense for Trespass to Land when

Trick Question: mistake is never a defense

200

Professionals such as doctors, lawyers, architects, and engineers are held to the standard of

Reasonably prudent professional in same or similar circumstances

200

Three types of fault systems in negligence 

Contributory Negligence, Modified Comparative Fault, Pure Comparative Fault

200

This doctrine allows employers to be held liable for negligence of employees acting within scope of employment and the phrase means

Respondeat Superior, "Let the master answer"

300

Elements of Trespass to Land

Intentionally entering or causing entry of another person or object to land rightfully owned by another, without prior authorization or legal privilege

300

Define Private Necessity

A private individual under reasonable necessity, infringes upon another's property rights to protect private interest

300

These groups owe a heightened duty of care to customers

Common Carriers and Innkeepers

300

In a Contributory Negligence State, a plaintiff can still recover if at fault by using

Last Clear Chance Doctrine

300

Allows plaintiff to bar defendant from asserting assumption of risk as a defense

Rescue Doctrine

400

Elements of False Imprisonment

Intentionally confining victim to a bounded area determined by tortfeasor, and victim is either aware of confinement or harmed by it

400

Define Public Necessity

A public official or private citizen, acting under reasonable necessity, infringes on another's property rights while seeking to protect threatened public interests

400

Name the five elements of the Attractive Nuisance Doctrine

1. Dangerous object or condition on land

2. Attracts child trespassers

3. Children unable to appreciate danger because of age

4. Landowner know or has reason to know condition attracts child trespassers

5. Burden of making safe or warning is minor compared to risk of harm

400

Awareness of a dangerous condition created by the defendant and still choosing to encounter it

Implied Secondary Assumption of the Risk

400

Duty owed to an undiscovered trespasser vs a discovered trespasser

Undiscovered: refrain from wanton or willful acts

Discovered: warn of concealed dangerous conditions

500

Elements of Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress (IIED)

Intentionally or recklessly engaging in extreme and outrageous conduct that causes severe emotional harm

500

When a person commits acts that violate prior authorization or privilege

Exceeding scope of consent

500

To meet requirements of Negligence Per Se, plaintiff must show

They are within class of persons statute is intended to protect and suffered type of harm statute is intended to prevent

500

Exceptions to the open and obvious danger exception

Landowner knows victim is unable to avoid danger or will fail to protect themselves from it

500

Name the two judges from Palsgraf and summarize the tests they favored

Cardozo: Foreseeable Zone of Danger

Andrews: Natural and Continuous Sequence

M
e
n
u