Literal
Inferential
Evaluative
100
Why was Alex confused?
He was wondering how his teacher got to know about him cheating.
100
How do we know that Alex was not thinking when he hit his friend ?
He was overwhelmed with guilt and terror after he hit Jeremy.
100
What do you think would happen to the two boys ?
They would be punished by the principal for fighting.
200
Why did Jeremy tell on Alex ?
He was wondering how his teacher got to know about him cheating.
200
Quote a phrase that shows that Jeremy was not expecting Alex to hit him.
It is the phrase 'eyes turning wide with terror'.
200
How do you think Alex would have dealt with the situation if Jeremy had apologized?
He probably would have forgiven him. Alex would have probably given Jeremy the chance to explain.
300
What was it that Alex wanted to do when he said "An eye for an eye ..." ?
He wanted to get even on that day.
300
How do you know that Alex was sorry for what he had done ?
He was feeling guilty.
300
What do you think the teacher should have done in this situation?
The teacher should have put a stop to it before everything escalated.
400
Who were the 'cheerleaders'?
They were the pupils in the canteen.
400
Was Jeremy badly hurt ? How do you know ?
No, he was able to fight back.
400
After knocking him down to the ground, Alex felt sorry and tried to help him but Jeremy fought back. What do you think Alex would have done if Jeremy did not fight back?
Alex would have helped him up and they probably would have talked it out. They still would have been friends.
500
What made Alex so unhappy with Jeremy ?
He was unhappy as Jeremy had told the teacher that he had cheated in the test.
500
What do you think was meant by 'The school was clearly divided into two'?
This means that some persons were on Alex's side and some on Jeremy's side.
500
Do you think that the crowd hyped up the fight? Why?
Possible Answers: Yes because they were cheering them on to boost the fight. No because that would be a person's natural response when angry.
M
e
n
u