400
*Daily Double*
Who thought of the name "Pearl of Great Price"?
Franklin D. Richards.
Early versions of the sections of our current Pearl of Great Price were printed individually by the Missouri press in 1832-33. Joseph Smith’s history was published in installments in periodicals. The Book of Abraham, as we have it, also was published in three installments, and more of that translation was planned to be published, but mob violence derailed that plan. Parts of the Book of Moses were published here and there.
It wasn’t until 1851 (7 years after the Prophet’s death) that these “miscellaneous” writings were compiled into one body, The Pearl of Great Price, similar to the way that it is today. So who thought of the name, The Pearl of Great Price? And who thought to put these revelations together? Well, it was not the Prophet, Brigham Young. Surprise: It was not even done under the direction of the First Presidency! It was a mission president who thought of the idea, Elder Franklin D. Richards.
By that year, 1851, there were 31,000 members of the Church in Great Britain and 2/3rds of those had been members of the Church for four years or less. They had never had access to those revelations published in the early church periodicals. So Elder Richards, as a member of the Quorum of the Twelve and President of the British Mission, put them together, titled it The Pearl of Great Price, and distributed it among the British saints. This publication included the Books of Moses and Abraham, as well as the History of Joseph Smith, the Articles of Faith, Joseph Smith – Matthew, some selections from the D&C, and a poem entitled “Truth.”
In 1878 Elder Orson Pratt, the church historian, edited and rearranged the Pearl of Great Price, putting it in the Book of Moses in chronological order, similar to how it is today. What is now Moses 1 was titled “Visions of Moses,” and the rest of Moses, chapters 2-8, was titled “Writings of Moses.” In October Conference of 1880, the Pearl of Great Price was accepted as scripture and became part of the standard works. “Canonizing did not increase its truth or worth but did make it official Church literature.”