The 1957 Act
The 1984 Act
Visitors vs
Trespassers
Case Law Classics
Defences and
Exclusions
100

The duty is owed to this category of people under the 1957 Act.

Who are visitors?

100

The duty is owed to this category of people under the 1984 Act.

Who are non-visitors or trespassers?

100

A visitor is someone with this type of permission.

What is express or implied permission?

100

This foundational case defines "occupier" using control as the key test.

What is Wheat v Lacon?

100

This case involved a person who hadn’t moved in yet and was found not to be an occupier.

What is Mathewson v Crump?

200

This section of the Act defines the common duty of care.

What is Section 2(2)?

200

This section outlines the three-part test for when a duty arises.

What is Section 1(3)?

200

This pre-1984 case gave us the “allurement” doctrine.

What is Glasgow Corporation v Taylor?

200

Lord Denning’s example of someone sliding down banisters came from this case.

What is The Calgarth?

200

Contributory negligence was applied in this hotel window case.

What is White Lion Hotel v James?

300

According to this case, an occupier may not need to warn of obvious dangers like deep water.

What is Darby v National Trust?

300

This case held no duty was owed when a boy fell off a fire escape.

What is Keown v Coventry Healthcare NHS Trust?

300

This case involved a confused hospital patient treated as a visitor.

What is Spearman v Royal United Bath Hospital?

300

A court held that the owner of an empty house had control and was therefore liable in this case.

What is Harris v Birkenhead Corporation?

300

A warning must make the visitor ________ in order to discharge the duty.

What is reasonably safe?

400

Section 2(3)(a) reminds occupiers to be extra cautious around these types of visitors.

Who are children?

400

Under s.1(6), a duty is not owed if the risk was this.

What is willingly accepted (volenti)?

400

In this case involving a 'savage beast', repeated tolerance of trespass led to an implied license.

What is Lowery v Walker?

400

This case drew a line between skilled visitors and common hazards.

What is Roles v Nathan?

400

Even this group can be considered occupiers if they control the property.

Who are landlords (under certain leases)?

500

These three criteria under s.2(4)(b) must be satisfied to avoid liability for a contractor’s work.

What are (i) reasonable to entrust, (ii) contractor is competent, and (iii) work checked if needed?

500

According to Naylor v Payling, reasonable steps don’t always include what?

What is checking insurance documents?

500

This case confirmed that intoxication doesn’t negate trespasser status.

What is Kolasa v Ealing Hospital NHS Trust?

500

Lord Hoffmann’s speech on foolishness and freedom comes from this case.

What is Tomlinson v Congleton?

500

These Acts limit the ability to exclude liability for personal injury or death.

What are UCTA 1977 and the Consumer Rights Act 2015?

M
e
n
u