Assault & Battery
Assault: Intent, imminent apprehension of harmful or offensive contact, no consent
Battery: Intent, harmful or offensive contact, no consent
Shop Keeper's Privilege
reasonable suspicion
reasonable detention
IIED
Outrageous conduct by d
Intent to cause or reckless disregard
sever emotional distress
not consented to
False Imprisonment
intent to confine
p is aware
no consent
Elements to
Trespass to Land and
Trespass to chattel
TL: Intent, interference w/ right to possess
TC: Intent, interference w/ right to possess, cause harm to chattel
Explain Self Defense
persons are entitled to defend themselves when they reasonably believe they are about to be seriously injured
amount of force d exerted
means or object by which d applies
manner or method used
surrounding circumstances
Intent
Knowing w/ substantially Or Purposefully
Transferred Intent: Applies to all Intentional Torts. Not to IIED.
The following do not negate intent:
Mistake, child, disability, intoxication
Private Necessity
Actor is liable for any harm that results from his intrusion
protecting own private interest, you are privileged to do so
Exception: actor is privileged by virtue of being able to take certain liberties w/ another's property in the attempt to avoid harm
Public Necessity
privilege to take whatever steps appear reasonable to prevent imminent public disaster
EXCEPT:
During actual warfare
prevent imminent public catastropheabate public nuisance
Contributory Negligence
Total Bar. P was negligent, claims nothing
Last Clear Chance
P can recover a portion of her damages as long as d was best positioned to avoid causing injury
Comparative Fault/Pure Comparative Negligence
P can recover what he was not responsible for
Modified Comparative Negligence "Less Than"
P recovers as long as p fault is LESS THAN that of d
target is 49 or less
P explicitly agrees to accept the risk
Risk Utility Test
Probability
Gravity
Burden
Utility
Statute Provided
Class intended to protect
Injury intended to prevent
Proximate Cause
Foreseeability Test
whether the d should have reasonably forseen
Thin Skull/Eggshell Test
Take p as they are
Presumption that the a p with an ailment is foreseeable
Misfeasance vs. Nonfeasance
Misfeasance: affirmative steps to take risk (DUTY)
Nonfeasance: failure to act, NO DUTY, unless
special relationship
Dangerous instrumentality
Premises Liability
Trespasser
Liscensee
InviteeLessor-Lessee
Res Ipsa Loquitor
Accident does not usually happen w/o negligence
Instrumentality in d complete control
p did not contribute
(inferred negligence)
Bystander
Default Rule: bystander cannot recover
Unless: familial relationship to the injured
Rebuttable Presumption
Allows the d to challenge the statute
Evidence of Negligence
some evidence of negligence, p has not yet met the burden of proof to establish duty and breach by the preponderance of the evidence