Intentional Torts
Wild Card
Negligence
Random
Strict Liability
100

Battery consists of these elements.

1. Intending to cause

2. Harmful or offensive contact with someone

3. Harmful or offensive contact occurs

100

What is Bailey Barnes' wife's name

Larissa

100

This is the default test for cause in fact.

What is the but-for test?

100

This rule bars liability of an employer when an employee is commuting to and from work.

What is the going-and-coming rule?

100

States that allow this rule impose strict liability on domesticated animals only after the first bite.

What is the one-bite rule?

200

Merlin locks Riley in her room but Riley sleeps through the entire confinement and never knows it happened. Is Merlin liable for false imprisonment?

No.

200

What duty did Riley breach by not telling Mero about putting nuts in the cookies.

Duty to disclose

200

Under the majority rule of Palsagraf, the defendant owes a duty to only these plaintiffs.

What are foreseeable plaintiffs?

200

Employers generally are not liable for this category of workers unless a non-delegable duty or special exception applies.

What are independent contractors?

200

This group of people are often referred to as the stream of commerce or the chain of distribution.

Component maker -> Manufacturer -> Wholesaler -> Dealer -> Consumer

300

This defense fails if granted through fraud or misrepresentation.

What is consent?

300

What date was Myers appointed dean

April 9, 2012

300

This rule bars evidence of outside payments made to the plaintiff.

What is the collateral source rule?

300

A manufacturer sells a blender missing a screw, making it vibrate violently when used. It injures the buyer. What type of defect is this and explain.

Manufacturing defect.

  • The product that injured the plaintiff was manufactured by the defendant
  • The product was defective
  • plaintiff was injured as a result (actual and proximate cause of injury was the defect)
  • The defect was present in the product at the time of sale
300

A dog with a known history of biting breaks off its leash and injures a jogger. what rule under the animal section of strict liability describes the dogs behavior.

Vicious propensity

400

These are defenses/privileges of intentional torts.

What is consent, self-defense, defense of others, defense of property, recovery of property, necessity, authority of law, discipline, justification

400

Which professor's teacher's told him to go to law school instead of medical school

Gary Myers

400

Damages: These small awards vindicate rights even where no actual loss occurred.

What are nominal damages?

400

A surgeon performs a different procedure than the one consented to, even though both were medically appropriate. What tort applies?

Battery

400

These 6 factors determine whether an activity is abnormally dangerous.

1. Existence of a high degree of risk

2. Likelihood that harm will result is great

3. Inability to eliminate the risk by reasonable care

4. Extent to which the activity is not common

5. Inappropriateness of the activity to the place it is carried on

6. Extent of its value to the community outweighs the dangerous attributes

500

During a severe storm, a sailor ties his boat to a private dock to avoid capsizing, damaging the dock. Is the sailor liable?

Yes, but he can use necessity as a defense, thus making him only liable for actual damages of the dock and not trespass.

500

On average, how late is Mero.

2 hours

500

This test applies when multiple forces operate, and each force alone would have been sufficient to cause the injury.

Substantial factor test

500

A man leaves his truck running on a steep hill without the brake. It rolls down and injures someone. What negligence doctrine applies?

Res Ipsa Loquitur.

500

What are the factors of the risk utility test?

  • Usefulness and desirability of the product to the user and public as a whole
  • Likelihood that it will cause injury and the probable seriousness of the injury
  • Reasonable alternative design available?
  • Aka meaning the availability of a substitute product
  • If manufacturer could eliminate danger w/o destroying usefulness
  • If manufacturer could eliminate danger w/o making it too expensive
  • Most jurisdictions require that the plaintiff prove the existence of a reasonable alternative design in order to prove design defect; however, if the product is so dangerous and of such low social utility, some jurisdictions will impose liability even if there is no reasonable alternative design
  • Some jurisdictions view it as only a factor
  • Ordinarily would need expert testimony
  • Manufacturer’s ability to eliminate unsafe character without degrading utility
  • User’s ability to avoid danger by exercising due care (Defective design vs. operator error)
  • User’s anticipated awareness of inherent dangers and avoid-ability of such dangers
  • The expected understanding of the consumer’s dangers
  • Feasibility of manufacturer of carrying liability insurance, etc. (manufacturer’s ability to cover potential losses)
M
e
n
u