Intentional Torts
Negligence: Duty
Negligence: SoC
Negligence: BoD
Negligence: CiF + NIED
100

Define offensive contact

A defendant who knows the plaintiff has a special sensitivity but touches them anyway has committed this type of contact.

100

A shopper in Target or a customer in Starbucks is this type of entrant.

What is invitee?

100

A child operating a snowmobile or car is held to this standard

What is the adult standard of care?

100

If the plaintiff cannot identify any specific act or omission by the defendant, they may use this doctrine to establish breach.

What is res ipsa loquitor?

100

When multiple fires merge to destroy a house, and each fire alone could have caused the entire harm, courts typically use this test.

What is the substantial factor test?

200

The torts transferred intent applies to 

What is Battery, Assault, False Imprisonment, Trespass to Land, Trespass to Chattels?



200

The possessor must know or have reason to know that the child will trespass.

What is child land entrant doctrine?

200

This doctrine applies when the defendant is confronted with a sudden, unexpected event requiring a split-second decision.

What is sudden emergency doctrine?

200

A plaintiff may argue negligence by pointing out that the defendant failed to follow this.

What is deviation from custom?

200

The plaintiff must prove “but for” causation by this evidentiary standard.

What is a preponderance of the evidence?

300

(Defenses) This type of necessity requires the defendant to compensate the plaintiff even though they acted to avoid a greater harm.

What is private necessity?

300

No duty is the assumption unless some circumstance arises where an exception applies.

What is Nonfeasance? 

300

Under the child standard, a child’s conduct is measured against children of similar age, maturity, experience, and intelligence—making this standard __________.

What is subjective?

300

Under the patient rule, a doctor breaches duty by failing to disclose this

What is material risk?

300

State the Thing requirements

California’s Thing v. La Chusa requires a plaintiff to be “closely related,” present at the scene, and aware of the injury as it happens. P suffers severe emotional distress, more than a disinterested bystander would suffer 

400

(Defenses) Under this rule, a defender’s use of force to protect a third party is justified only if the third party had the legal right to use self-defense.

What is the “limited privilege” rule in defense of others?

400

To determine foreseeability in duty to protect 

What is Prior or similar incidents test, Balancing test, Totality-of-the-circumstances test?

400

This phrase emphasizes that the RPP test is objective, not based on the defendant’s personal traits or experience.

What is “same or similar circumstances”?

400

Helps determine whether a defendant failed to act as a reasonably prudent person in some evidence jurisdictions.

What is B < P L?

400

Two special exceptions universally allow NIED recovery without impact, physical danger, zone of danger, or Thing/Dillon requirements.

What are negligent death notification and mishandling of a corpse?

500

Abuse of authority, patterns of harassment, or exploiting known susceptibility all help prove this element of an intentional tort. 

What is extreme and outrageous conduct (element of IIED)

500

State all of the Rowland Factors

What is: 

The foreseeability of the harm of the plaintiff  

The degree of certainty that the plaintiff suffered injury   

The closeness of the connection between the defendant’s conduct and the injury suffered    

The moral blame attached to the defendant’s conduct   

The policy of preventing future harm 

The burden to the defendant and the consequences to the community of imposing a duty to exercise care with resulting liability for breach, and  

The availability, cost and prevalence of insurance for the risk involved   

500

Inexperience, clumsiness, or low intelligence do not change the standard of care because the test remains this.

What is objective?

500

Even when an industry consistently follows a dangerous practice, courts may reject it if it falls below this standard.

What is the reasonable prudent person standard?

500

California’s Burgess case creates this, allowing direct NIED without impact or being in the zone of danger.

What is a pre-existing duty?

M
e
n
u