200
Julie was referred for psychoeducational evaluation when she was six. Her teacher was concerned about her, as she seemed immature, accident prone and unfocused. Yet, her parents and teacher also knew Julie to be highly verbal. She was from a family of high achievers: expectations ran high. Her history was ‘normal’. She was a full-term baby, was healthy, and had reached all developmental milestones as expected. One historical fact should have flashed a warning light, but didn't: She had been in a car accident when she was two years old.
After two years, Julie's parents requested a reevaluation, as she was “falling behind” in school and they felt that she might benefit from exposure to “mainstream expectations of learning”. At 10, Julie’s IQ had declined to the low average range. She no longer evidenced verbal strengths and continued to show weaknesses in short-term memory. Speech/language evaluation indicated delays in receptive vocabulary, word-finding difficulties and poor articulation. Julie was observed as being restless, distractible, anxious and depressed. She was again classified as LD, but, largely because of parental pressure, she was transferred to a mainstream class, with a continuation of speech therapy and counseling. Our staff suggested that the school psychologist reassess Julie using a cognitive battery designed to pinpoint Julie’s cognitive deficits/strengths. This assessment will give her teachers and therapists a better idea about how to reach and teach Julie in the future.